47 pages • 1 hour read
Gordon KormanA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
War Stories follows the journey of three generations of men in the same family, with each character representing a different perspective on the subject of war. Trevor, the youngest member of the group, is naturally the most idealistic and enthusiastic about the topic. He is particularly enthralled by World War II, which he views simplistically as the ultimate confrontation between good and evil. At multiple points, Trevor’s father, Daniel, explicitly uses the word “glamorizing” in a derogatory sense to describe his son’s attitude toward war. As the reader perceives the battlefields of Europe through Trevor’s eyes, even with Jacob and Daniel as choric figures striving to temper his enthusiasm, Trevor seems—at first—incapable of acknowledging the downside of the conflict. In his mind, the people of Europe should feel nothing but fawning gratitude toward the American soldiers who rid them of Hitler.
Trevor’s reductionist approach to World War II stems, in part, from the media he consumes. When the reader is first introduced to Trevor, we see him enthusiastically playing a World War II video game. His father struggles to tear him away from the screen because he is so swept up in the adventure and drama of combat. Early on, Trevor has a vague sense of the difference between simulated experience and lived experience. However, his keen interest in his great-grandfather’s lived experience is more oriented around a wish for greater intensity of what Trevor has experienced via his video games. It does not encompass a wish to grasp the complexities and depth, technically and emotionally, of the events.
Trevor’s glamorization of warfare centers the largest, most intense battles of the conflict, portraying soldiers as highly skilled adult men confident in their abilities. Accordingly, Trevor aspires to become a similar hero one day—a man like he assumes his great-grandfather was, who comes to gain the admiration of thousands for his role as a hero. Initially, Trevor can only fulfill this fantasy through gaming and living vicariously through Jacob’s memories. As his journey proceeds, however, because Trevor values the sweep and drama of warfare, the family’s drive through hedgerow country is especially deflating:
‘But it just seems wrong. In video games, war is huge crazy battles, with ginormous explosions and everybody fighting full-on.’ ‘Maybe somebody should have pointed out to you,’ Dad put in sarcastically, ‘that video games aren’t the same as real life. Oh, wait. Somebody tried to. But you wouldn’t listen to me’ (97).
Similarly, Trevor is stricken when he realizes that two of Jacob’s friends, Leland and Freddie, died without heroics or fanfare—their deaths were swift and unremarkable, occurring before either man had much change to fight back.
Trevor’s glamorization of warfare meets a powerful counterforce when he first confronts Juliette. In this confrontation, while Trevor is only just beginning his journey of understanding the trauma of war on a personal level, Juliette has understood this aspect of warfare her entire life. Her fierce animosity toward Jacob, ironically, helps Trevor make the shift from viewing World War II as a spectator to understanding it as a source of profound generational trauma.
Much as Trevor embodies the glamorization of warfare, Jacob demonstrates the realities of combat. In the chapters that describe Jacob’s real-time experience as a soldier in 1944, both the reader and Trevor get a chance to understand the frightening chaos of a major battle. Moreover, Jacob’s memories reveal that the trauma of war often stems not only from those intense, short-term, allegedly “glorious” clashes but also from the non-combat periods between. Military efforts could also involve brutal training, punishing drudgery like digging trenches, grueling travel to other locations, and interactions with civilians that could put all parties at risk.
Jacob’s description of the D-Day invasion emphasizes that mistakes are common in warfare, and without the benefit of historical hindsight, the actors in the midst of the battles have no assurance their side will win. Jacob experiences ample issues. Boats sink. Soldiers get seasick. Tanks founder or explode before even reaching land. History books are generally seeking to cover vast periods of time while affirming their respective nation’s actions; as a result, the emphasis is on the glory of victory. Jacob’s day-to-day experience as a soldier, in contrast, helps Trevor step into the reality of warfare. The mundane business of moving a battle line a few feet each day, for example, is brought home to Trevor when Jacob explains the battles of the hedgerows. This type of conflict doesn’t fit Trevor’s glamorous notions, and he objects:
‘It’s that battle of the hedgerows you talked about.’ Trevor struggled to put his feelings into words. ‘I get that it happened and all that. But it just doesn’t sound, you know, war enough.’ The old soldier laughed mirthlessly. ‘Let me assure you it was war enough. For a lot of good men, it was too much war. They never came home from bocage country’ (96).
Aside from the mind-numbing experience of plowing through an endless series of hedgerows, Jacob also highlights the monotony of digging trenches and marching for days on end without sleep.
Taken together, Jacob’s memories paint a picture of the average soldier not as a highly skilled adult assassin but as a frightened, exhausted youth kept constantly on the edge of collapse. Jacob describes the weight of a backpack and the discomfort of a heavy uniform in hot weather. Worse still, in Trevor’s eyes, these young men are profoundly vulnerable. Dangers include far more than the enemy. Dying in vain is common—friendly fire, for example, could end a soldier’s life before he even gets the chance to fight. Much of warfare is simply chaos and random accident. Freddie steps on a landmine, and he is gone, a single mistake costing him his life in brutal fashion. The survivors, then, are not the stalwart heroes that Trevor imagines either. Rather, they are traumatized people left to ponder how easily any one of them might have met a similar fate.
Just as Trevor represents the glamorization of war and Jacob exemplifies the realities of combat, Daniel stresses the personal consequences of victory. From Daniel’s perspective, nobody wins when war breaks out. In a late conversation, Trevor admits, “‘This whole country—I mean, we liberated it, but we also blew a heck of a lot of it to smithereens.’ ‘War makes a better video game,’ his father agreed. ‘But if you’re looking for a way to live, I’ll take peace every time’” (223).
It’s no accident that Daniel is a history teacher. As a student of history, he recognizes not only the ways in which battles shape the world but also the lives and families that are shattered in the process. Daniel isn’t a pacifist who insists on peace at any price. He acknowledges that Hitler needed to be stopped. However, he refuses to glorify World War II as a grand adventure, and he openly chastises his son for trying to do so. Every gain contains an equal amount of loss. At many points, Daniel tries to make Trevor see the personal price of victory. Other minor characters echo this idea as well. When young Jacob shares his grievances with a fellow soldier, the latter reminds him to bear in mind the suffering of others:
‘Any time you’re feeling sorry for yourself, remember the people of Saint-Lô. They got flattened by us on D-Day. They got bombed by the Germans. And guess where the generals have decided Operation Cobra should be.’ He checked his wristwatch. ‘They’re going to get it again in about twenty minutes. Poor Frenchies’ (113).
When the Firestones tour all the locations where Jacob fought, they are confronted with the fact that liberation didn’t come without sacrifice. Entire towns were leveled; sometimes, that destruction was entirely unnecessary. Young Jacob mentions this fact while in Paris, where a tank destroys an entire building just to kill a single sniper that Jacob might have easily dispatched with his rifle.
Often, such needless destruction is the result of random chance. Nowhere is this more evident than in the story of the Lafleur family. They are in constant jeopardy because of their involvement in the French Resistance. However, Jacob’s simple decision to walk away from a fight with a Nazi soldier costs the family their lives. This senseless destruction is just as wasteful and heart-rending as Freddie stepping on a landmine or Leland getting blown up on a bridge. Aside from the personal cost of lives destroyed, Daniel also points out that these personal tragedies affect families and future generations, too. This generational trauma is part of the grim price of victory.
By Gordon Korman