53 pages • 1 hour read
John Lewis, Mike D'OrsoA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Nashville in 1996 looks drastically different from the one Lewis lived in as a student. Many of the stores that he helped integrate in downtown Nashville are no longer in business: “it was eerie to see [downtown Nashville] so empty and to see all those businesses—battlefields in a nonviolent campaign that was every bit as strategic as a war—gone” (58).
Lewis then flashes back to his first year at the American Baptist Theological Seminary in Nashville (ABT). Lewis desired to no longer be on the sidelines of history, so in 1957 he applied as a transfer student to Troy State University (now Troy University), which only accepted White students. After not getting a response from the university—a typical result when Black students applied to universities in the American South—Lewis sent a letter to Dr. King. Fred Gray, Dr. King’s lawyer, and Reverend Ralph David Abernathy, the minister of Montgomery’s First Baptist Church, responded with a round-trip bus ticket to Montgomery, Alabama. Lewis met with Dr. King, Gray, and Reverend Abernathy in 1958. The three leaders were willing to help Lewis if he truly wanted to desegregate Troy State, but Lewis decided not to force the issue with the university because his parents worried he would be killed. He was also afraid that his parents might face retaliation, losing their land or store credit for their son challenging segregation.
Locals called Nashville the “Athens of the South” (72), because it was one of the most educated and racially progressive cities in the American South. It was home to major colleges and universities (e.g., Fisk University, Belmont University, Vanderbilt University, and Meharry Medical College). Black people served on the police force, city council, and Board of Education. However, despite this progressiveness, in the late 1950s, racial segregation still prevailed in Nashville’s public schools, libraries, theaters, hotels, restaurants, and department store lunch counters. There was also still violence: An elementary school was bombed after officials announced a school desegregation plan.
Despite the violence and local, state, and federal authorities’ lack of interest in desegregating the South, Lewis felt certain in 1958 that, “this thing that was swelling around me, this movement, was not going to be stopped” (73). At one Sunday service, the Reverend Kelly Miller Smith invited James Lawson to speak.
Lawson, a proponent and teacher of nonviolent direct action, became Lewis’s mentor. From the fall of 1958, Lawson, then a divinity student at Vanderbilt University, began holding workshops for students in the basement of Clark Memorial United Methodist, a church near Fisk campus. Those Tuesday evening workshops became the focus of Lewis’s life. To him, the subject of nonviolence “spoke to everything that had been stirring in my soul for so long” (76). Lawson’s workshops attracted both Black and White students. Students engaged in role-playing exercises to prepare themselves for situations that they might encounter during nonviolent protests. Some students played angry White bystanders who beat the protestors while calling them racial slurs. Lawson taught students how to withstand these attacks and protect themselves without fighting back.
Lawson, Reverend Smith, and several of his Nashville student protégés, including John Lewis, James Bevel, Bernard Lafayette, and Diane Nash, began to test the segregation polices at department stores located in downtown Nashville. The students sat at Whites-only lunch counters, but left after being denied service—a prelude to sit-ins.
The first lunch-counter sit-in took place in Greensboro, North Carolina, on February 1, 1960. On February 13, 1960, 12 days later, the Nashville student leaders held their first sit-in. 124 students met at the staging area, First Baptist, and then proceeded to Fifth Avenue, Nashville’s busiest shopping street. From here, the students branched off into groups heading to the various “five-and-dime stores,” (95) including Woolworth’s, McClellan’s, and Kress’s. Lewis’s group went to Woolworth’s store. They made purchases and then sat at the lunch counter, where the waitress refused to serve them. She closed the counter and the lights were shut-off in that section of the store. The students sat for several hours reading and doing their homework in the dark. They received some taunts from White men, but there was no violence.
This lack of violence lasted only a few days. Taunts escalated to pushing and shoving as the students made their way down Fifth Avenue to their targeted stores. White men started to target the Black citizens of Nashville at random. For example, a Black teenager who worked at one of the stores where the lunch counter sit-ins took place was badly beaten by a group of White men. The violence continued to escalate with White men beating students at the lunch counters, pouring mustard and ketchup on them, stubbing lit cigarettes on them, and trying to push them off their chairs. White students participating in the sit-ins often “attracted particularly brutal attention” (100). Despite the violence, the students all upheld their nonviolent practices.
Though the police arrested the sit-in participants, including Lewis, for “disorderly conduct” (100), waves of students kept replacing them, making it difficult for police to arrest all the protestors. While in jail, Lewis and his fellow activists refused to pay bail: “We were not about to cooperate in any way with a system that allowed the discrimination we were protesting” (102). Instead, the students sang. The city released the students after several hours. At their hearing the following day, Zephaniah Alexander Looby, an attorney and civil rights activist, defended the students. The judge refused to hear Looby’s argument and found all the students guilty. He gave the students two options: each could pay a $50 fine or serve thirty days in the county workhouse. Refusing to pay the fine, all the students chose jailtime.
Ben West, mayor of Nashville, ordered the students released the following day. He commissioned a biracial committee to study the issue of segregation in Nashville. The students agreed to halt the local sit-ins, but Nashville’s Black community boycotted all the downtown stores. Finally, the committee offered a proposal: Businesses in downtown Nashville would agree to a trial period during which they would serve Black customers separately in designated sections. Lewis and the other Nashville student activists rejected the proposal because it still involved segregation. The students resumed their sit-ins. Media coverage of these sit-ins helped show “firsthand the kind of anger and ugliness that the peaceful movements for civil rights was prompting in the South” (100).
In April 1960, the students founded the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC). One day after this meeting, dynamite destroyed Looby’s house. While no one was hurt, this violent act spurred more Black Nashville residents to action. They marched to City Hall to protest the racial violence and the city’s lack of response to it. Mayor West finally conceded and on May 10, 1960, Nashville began desegregating its department stores.
Part 2 focuses on Lewis’s time at American Baptist Theological Seminary, at the epicenter of all major civil rights battles of the late 1950s and 1960s. ABT classes expose Lewis to new philosophical and theological ideas. These ideas support Lewis’s belief that there was a contradiction in all facets of American society between what was (i.e., segregation) and what ought to be (i.e., freedom and dignity for all Americans). Lewis embraced a belief in the “Spirit of History” (64), an invisible force or agent that guides an individual to be part of something bigger than themselves. The “Spirit of History” becomes a reoccurring motif throughout Lewis’s memoir.
One of the most critical concepts of this book is the philosophy of nonviolence. Drawing on Christian, Gandhian, and ancient Chinese philosophies, Lawson taught students that nonviolent principles—suffering, love, compassion, and the capacity to forgive—could end segregation. Lawson argued that the means to ending segregation must be consistent with the type of society students wanted to create. If students used violent tactics to overturn segregation, then the new world order would also be violent. Lewis deeply connected to this notion, not viewing nonviolent tactics simply as a means to an end, but instead devoting his entire life to this principle.
Lewis blames infighting for eventually destroying his family, the SNCC, and the movement more broadly. One of the fault lines was a generational divide. For example, when two distinguished Black community members on Mayor West’s biracial committee agreed to the committee’s proposal that downtown businesses integrate only partially, to Lewis, Diane Nash, James Bevel, Bernard Lafayette, and other Nashville students, this proposal equated to “partial segregation” (106), and they could not understand how two Black individuals could endorse such a policy. In fact, they viewed this endorsement as a betrayal. Yet, older Black members of their community found this proposal acceptable.
By these authors
African American Literature
View Collection
Black History Month Reads
View Collection
Books About Leadership
View Collection
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Books on U.S. History
View Collection
Civil Rights & Jim Crow
View Collection
Inspiring Biographies
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection