42 pages • 1 hour read
Malcolm GladwellThe Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference
Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2000A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Introduction-Chapter 1Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Introduction Summary
The Tipping Point argues that “ideas and products and message and behaviors spread just like viruses do” (7). Thus, Gladwell presents such phenomena as crime waves and fashion trends as epidemics. He observes that social epidemics like New York City’s sudden drop in crime in the 1990s and the rise in popularity of Hush Puppies shoes broadly share three patterns: “contagiousness”; “little causes can have big effects”; and “change happens not gradually but at one dramatic moment” (9). Gladwell calls this dramatic moment of change a Tipping Point.
Thinking about social epidemics is unintuitive and requires one to abandon common sense. People may not often consider the ways that unconscious behaviors like the simple act of yawning can be extremely contagious. Further, people are trained to engage in cause-and-effect thinking. This makes it difficult for them to predict situations in which “the end result—the effect—seems far out of proportion to the cause” (11), such as trying to imagine how tall a piece of paper folded 50 times would grow.
The author intends to answer two major questions in this book: “Why is it that some ideas or behaviors or products start epidemics and others don’t? And what can we do to deliberately start and control positive epidemics of our own?” (14).
Chapter 1 Summary: “The Three Rules of Epidemics”
One can better comprehend epidemics by understanding the “the three rules of the Tipping Point—the Law of the Few, the Stickiness Factor [and] the Power of Context” (29). Popular explanations for the Baltimore syphilis epidemic of 1995-96 illustrate these three rules. Epidemiologist John Potterat focuses on “the people who were carrying syphilis" (18), an illustration of the Law of the Few. Johns Hopkins University Professor of Medicine Dr. John Zenilman, however, blames “the disease itself” (18) after a breakdown in municipal services, which reflects the Stickiness Factor. Finally, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) points to the rise of crack cocaine usage in Baltimore and the “overall context of the disease” (18) in an explanation that demonstrates the Power of Context.
According to the Law of the Few, epidemics spread because of the efforts of “a tiny percentage of people” who complete “the majority of the work” required for their dissemination (19). Potterat’s study of a gonorrhea epidemic in Colorado Springs, for example, shows that this epidemic tipped because of “the activities of 168 people living in four small neighborhoods” who “basically frequented the same six bars” (20). The HIV epidemic shows the power of the Stickiness Factor: The virus became "stickier" as it evolved into a more virulent and deadly form. Finally, the case of Kitty Genovese, who was assaulted while 38 witnesses did nothing to assist her, shows that people “are a lot more sensitive to their environment than they seem” (29), highlighting the Power of Context. Gladwell attributes this unresponsiveness to the fact that the responsibility to intervene was thinly spread among a high number of people and postulates that in a context with only two or three witnesses, intervention was more likely to occur.
Introduction-Chapter 1 Analysis
Gladwell opens the book with the social epidemic of Hush Puppies shoe sales exploding or “tipping” in the 1990s; this is fitting because many of his examples of epidemics relate to consumer products. It is difficult to separate Gladwell’s approach to epidemics—particularly of the mechanisms by which they can be socially engineered—from the pursuit of profit.
The introduction reflects Gladwell’s optimism that change is possible in the realm of human affairs. In fact, “the possibility of sudden change is at the center of the idea of the Tipping Point” (12). The most important instance of sudden change in the book is the dramatic reduction in New York City crime in the 1990s, which Gladwell attributes to broken windows theory. However, he later admitted to being overly enthusiastic about this concept, which downplays the role of structural inequalities in the perpetuation of crime.
In Chapter 1, Gladwell outlines his three agents of change, which are the major factors responsible for the success of social epidemics. He makes explicit comparisons between epidemics of disease and social epidemics in this chapter; for example, he notes that viral epidemics require a few unique individuals who carry a disproportionate amount of responsibility for the spread, as is true of social epidemics. This idea is captured in his Law of the Few. Gladwell treats this subject matter in a clinical, matter-of-fact way, although his comparisons deal with people spreading fashion trends on the social side but with people becoming HIV-positive and dying on the disease side. In this section, Gladwell relies on the Patient Zero myth that attributed the North American spread of HIV to the Air Canada flight attendant Gaetan Dugas. Later research reveals that that this attribution is inaccurate and criticizes the anti-gay bias that helped popularize it.
Gladwell’s concepts are critiqued as sometimes being so broad or non-person-centered that their explanatory value is diminished. For example, he explains that HIV as a virus is extremely “sticky,” just as a catchy jingle from a cigarette advertisement is sticky. His attempt to compare two things that are as disparate as the infectious quality of HIV and the earworm quality of a song risks undermining the explanatory value or validity of his concept.
Related Titles
By Malcolm Gladwell
