42 pages • 1 hour read
Malcolm GladwellA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
While the importance of the messenger—Connectors, Mavens, and Salesmen—is vital to social epidemics, the actual content of the message is also important for achieving Tipping Points. Sesame Street and Blue’s Clues are two examples of sticky children’s television shows whose creators found “a simple way to package information” that made it “irresistible” (132).
The creators of Sesame Street discovered, “If you can hold the attention of children, you can educate them” (100). This contradicted received wisdom about the possibilities of education via TV. Crucially, children pay attention when the content makes sense, and they become distracted when the material is confusing. The stickiness of a program depends on how long a child’s eyes are actively and interestedly glued to the screen. Sesame Street’s legacy as an influential education children’s program is rooted in the realization that “if you paid careful attention to the structure of your material, you could dramatically enhance stickiness” (110). Substantial research about how young children digest television programs and when they become distracted informed these discoveries about sticky television, including psychologist Ed Palmer’s well-known Distractor technique that determined how often viewers actually paid attention to the screen by running a slideshow next to a television showing Sesame Street.
Blue’s Clues is even stickier than Sesame Street. While Sesame Street insisted on including some humor and cleverness designed to appeal to adults to keep parents interested, Blue’s Clues did away with wordplay, was more direct, and focused on “[teaching] kids how to think in the same way that kids teach themselves how to think—in the form of the story” (121). Unlike Sesame Street’s “magazine”-style presentation in which segments lasted a maximum of about three minutes, Blue’s Clues followed the same narrative format each week: “Steve, the host, presents the audience with a puzzle involving Blue, the animated dog” (122), with lots of changing scenery and a resolution at the end when Steve returns to his Thinking Chair. The show preserved the stickiest parts of Sesame Street and expanded them up under the philosophy that “kids are interested in being intellectually active when they watch TV, and given the opportunity they’ll be behaviorally active” (123). The show’s creators regularly tested episodes with groups of children to determine what worked and what didn’t, including the order of the segments or puzzles. Sometimes, a change in the order determined the stickiness of the episode. In this case, the secret of tipping was “tinkering, on the margin, with the presentation of [...] ideas” (131) instead of making major changes.
Gladwell interprets Joan Gantz Cooney’s mission in creating Sesame Street as creating “a learning epidemic to counter the prevailing epidemics of poverty and illiteracy” (89) when educational children’s programming for television was not taken seriously. This is another instance of Gladwell's broadly comparing different kinds of epidemics; he describes phenomena as different as structural poverty and children’s education in relationship to the medium of television. Cooney developed the show with the goal of better preparing "disadvantaged" children for school and igniting a passion for literacy within them and their families, but Gladwell extends this to the idea of fighting poverty as a result of the show. He bridges distinct worlds through the vector of social epidemics but is often criticized for his erasure of the distinctiveness and unequal cultural impact of the concepts that he pairs.
Gladwell explicitly avoids large-scale structural issues in this book; rather, his interest in epidemics is rooted in his conviction that people can effect real transformation through small and accessible changes. Focusing on overwhelming, seemingly unchangeable structural issues can discourage people from taking even the smallest action. Thus, his emphasis on the power of children’s television programming to combat negative epidemics aligns with Gladwell’s optimism regarding the possibility of generating meaningful change via manageable means. He confirms that multiple studies consistently demonstrate reading gains as a result of watching Sesame Street, but he does not provide evidence that the show's impact extends to the reform of economic systems.
By Malcolm Gladwell