logo

30 pages 1 hour read

Henry James

The Real Thing

Fiction | Short Story | Adult | Published in 1892

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Symbols & Motifs

Clothing

Clothing is symbolic of the roles and subsequent identities associated with the period’s social classes. As members of the upper class, the Monarchs find sharing costumes distasteful and insist they wear their own clothing during the modeling sessions. Models of lower strata—like the working-class Miss Churm and immigrant-class Oronte—can adopt various personas with realistic precision. Whereas the Monarchs view their attire as genuine and representative of their social status, more pliable models understand that clothing is a tool, not an identity.

From the onset, the narrator deduces from the Monarchs’ appearance that they are upper class, but he also ascertains that they purchased their clothing on credit. The Monarchs’ attitude toward clothing shows their attempt to uphold the refined, sophisticated identities that align with their social class. However, because the Monarchs are without financial means, their aristocratic identity is as much an artifice as Miss Churm presenting as a Russian princess. To wear “general use” costumes and not their own clothing would challenge the Monarchs’ social positioning. Mrs. Monarch rejects the “shabby” Miss Churm as a princess just as Major Monarch rejects Oronte as an “English gentleman.” The Monarchs’ view that clothing does not change one’s social status—and therefore cannot substitute for “the real thing”—is contradictory. They believe that clothing cannot elevate the lower class but can reinforce the identities of those in the upper class. The Monarchs do not understand that skills, like depth of expression, are more valuable in both life and art than one’s social air and attire.

Tea

Similarly, tea is symbolic of the period’s social customs, and the serving of tea preordains one’s role within society. Although he is only of the middle class, the artist, as an employer, is accustomed to having his models also serve him tea. In being served, the narrator positions himself as superior. Miss Churm fulfills this subservient role without complaint until the narrator asks her to serve the Monarchs. Miss Churm bristles at this request but abides. Because characters like Miss Churm and Oronte are of a lower social class, they must adhere to social customs in both public and private spheres.

To maintain an appearance of being “established,” the narrator instructs his models to cater to the Monarchs. In doing so, he reinforces public social roles within the private sphere of his studio at his models’ expense. However, when the dejected Monarchs attempt to fulfill subservient roles, the artist is “uncomfortable.” In witnessing this “perverse” role reversal—in which the upper-class Monarchs adopt roles of the lower class—the narrator can’t reconcile the “dreadful” scene and pays them to leave.

Height

When the artist draws Major and Mrs. Monarch, he depicts them as larger than intended, and they appear taller in their drawings than in real life. The way the narrator perceives the Monarchs’ height illustrates the themes of Perception and Authenticity in Artistry and Social Hierarchy in Late 19th-Century England. Due to Mrs. Monarch’s lack of expression, the artist is unable to “transform” her into anything but a seven-foot-tall lady. Despite his best efforts, the artist cannot seem to accurately capture the couple’s true form: “The case was worse with the Major—nothing I could do would keep him down, so that he became useful only for the representation of brawny giants” (150). He admits the Monarchs are only of normal stature, yet that doesn’t change how he draws them. The artist’s own shortness has made them loom large in comparison, and his mind struggles to properly comprehend their regular size.

The arrival of Oronte, who is short but can be drawn proportionately, reveals the artist’s own class biases. Although the artist commends Miss Churm and Oronte’s modeling abilities, he views them as more pliable due to their lower social class. When Major Monarch indicates that Oronte may not be the ideal vision of “an English gentleman,” the artist retorts with an outburst that reflects his personal feelings of being seen as small and insignificant: “I can’t be ruined for you!” (159). In this way, representational height is a motif that underscores the artist’s struggle to maintain authenticity when faced with “the real thing.”

“The Real Thing”

The phrase “the real thing” is recurring motif that develops the themes of Perception and Authenticity in Artistry and Aesthetics Versus Ethics. The phrase refers to various forms of authenticity, from art and literature to people’s sense of morality. The artist’s approach to his work is highly technical, but it lacks an emotional connection between himself and his subjects. He contrives scenes—as seen in his interactions with Miss Churm and Oronte—and presents them as artistically authentic. Publishers receive these illustrations with praise for the artist. However, with the Monarchs, the artist is forced to confront what is truly real, and the resulting art pieces have limited depth. Consequently, while the artist succeeds in transforming artifices into art, by doing so he reveals a crucial flaw in the depths and truths of his artistry.

The artist fails to draw profitable illustrations of the Monarchs but does not believe his failure results from his own artistic talents: “But after a few times I began to find her too insurmountably stiff; do what I would with it my drawing looked like a photograph or a copy of a photograph” (150). Although the artist criticizes the lifelessness of photography, his preference for artifice underscores the story’s critique of “mimetic” art, the imitative etching of reality through painting, photography, and drawing. The story challenges traditional notions of what truth can be expressed through art, asking if works that only imitate actual forms or scenes really hold any meaning as true works of art. By showing its characters struggling with the idea that art should seek other sympathies, James’s story presents a paradoxical subversion of realism: While mimetic art attempts to display truth objectively, it is bound by its own “perverse and cruel law” (161)—to present false images as truths.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text