63 pages • 2 hours read
Gordon S. WoodA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Gordon S. Wood was born in Massachusetts on November 27, 1933. He graduated summa cum laude from Tufts University in 1955, where he would later serve as a trustee. Wood joined the United States Air Force and earned his Master of Arts (MA) from Harvard University during his service. He continued at Harvard, studying under Bernard Bailyn to earn his Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in 1964. Wood published his dissertation in 1969, entitled, The Creation of the American Republic, 1776-1787. This book and Wood’s Radicalism of the American Revolution added fuel to a debate between proponents of “the Harvard republicanism” and “St. Louis republicanism.” These two views of republicanism differ over the timing of the change between the end of classical politics and the liberalism Americans came to embrace, prompting Wood to add a new Preface to Creation that expresses the idea that cultural changes are not sudden but more often come in subtle and complicated ways.
In his career, Wood has worked as a professor at Harvard University, the College of William and Mary, the University of Michigan, and Brown University. Wood held the Pitt Professorship of American History and Institutes at Cambridge University from 1982-1983. Wood has written many important articles during his career, including “Rhetoric and Reality in the American Revolution” (1966), and was a frequent contributor to The New Republic. He is the author of 10 additional books and has edited or contributed to 13 additional volumes. In 2009, Wood’s third volume of the Oxford History of the United States—Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789-1815 (2009) was a finalist for the 2010 Pulitzer Prize for History. Wood was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1988 and the American Philosophical Society in 1994.
Wood has been married to Louise Goss since April 30, 1956. Wood and Louise have three children, Christopher, Elizabeth, and Amy, all of whom have gone into academia.
Common people were the lowest level of society in the colonies, people who existed just to “eat and sleep and die and be forgotten” (26). They were considered inconsequential to the national character. The aristocracy looked down on them, uninterested in anything they had to say due to their lack of education and significance to an aristocrat’s world. Aristocrats would occasionally be friendly with common people, but aristocrats thought they were inferior to them and therefore their opinions didn’t matter. When a common man disparaged a gentleman’s reputation in public, the gentleman did nothing about it because he couldn’t be disparaged by someone beneath him in class.
In the years leading up to the Revolution, opinions on labor began to change. The common man no longer appeared to be someone who worked only to provide for his basic needs. However, this change in opinion did little to alter the attitudes against the common man. When unrest developed against the monarchy, it was the common man who protested and rioted in the streets. However, they were easily controlled by the gentlemen who served as their patrons. Still, the common man was seen as inconsequential to the character of the nation.
After the Revolution, things began to change. The founding fathers told the common man that everyone was equal and that each man had a right to pursue his own happiness. Common men took these ideas and ran with them, altering the commerce of the country through inland trading, moving to new lands, and breaking the bonds of the paternalistic society all the way down to the structure of the family unit. The common man took on the aristocrats, calling out their continued links to the traditions of the monarchy and pushing their way into politics. As time passed, the common man’s pursuit of happiness blurred the lines between them and the aristocrats. Over time, common men were in many cases as wealthy, as educated, and as engaged in civic virtue as the aristocrats.
The rise of the common man changed the social structures in America. Not only did they break the bonds of paternalism and embrace republican ideals, they also forced the older generations to redefine themselves and to let go of the old traditions that they continued to cling to. By embracing the idea of equality so fiercely, the common man took to a new level the republic Jefferson and the other founding fathers envisioned. If not for the actions of the common man, the United States would not have become what it did.
The American aristocratic class system has its roots in the English monarchy. In England, the aristocrats were often titled people with close connections to the king. In America, true aristocrats were only a small part of the population. However, there developed a class between the true aristocrats and the common people that was a class of men called gentlemen. This class was defined as men who were well-educated, well-mannered, and uninhibited by the need to labor. During the Enlightenment, these men were also expected to be disinterested and to devote their time and money to public service. Most of the founding fathers were members of this class.
Gentlemen were often officers in the army and given preferential treatment over common soldiers. They were lawyers and doctors who no longer practiced, men from families of good reputation. These men maintained their own reputations to a degree that required legal action whenever a false word was uttered against them. Gentlemen were leaders, patrons to the less fortunate, and the heart of American society before the Revolution.
Gentlemen are a product of the paternalistic society that developed early in the history of the colonies. They served a role in society as father-figures, caring for those who couldn’t always care for themselves. In this way, gentlemen were like small monarchs in their communities, governing everything society required. These men were also the revolutionaries who introduced ideas of republicanism into the American society and authored the Revolution.
After the Revolution, the common man ran with the ideas of equality and freedom that the founding fathers taught them and changed the basic fabric of society. In doing this, they redefined what it meant to be a gentleman and began calling themselves gentlemen. Common men held political office, engaged in trade without the help of a partisan, and lifted themselves up from humble beginnings to enter into the upper classes of society that were traditionally reserved for gentlemen. Aristocrats of the old order, such as Jefferson and Franklin, were threatened by this changing hierarchy and saw it as a failure of their republic. Despite their disillusionment, gentlemen like Jefferson made this new society possible.
Thomas Jefferson was born into a wealthy family, but he was the first in his family to go to college. Jefferson received a liberal arts education that would later come to define gentlemen, and he also attended law school. As a wealthy farmer, Jefferson was able to dedicate a great amount of time to political leadership, something he saw as both his duty and burden. Jefferson was also an inventor who didn’t seek patents for his inventions and looked down on inventors after the Revolution who asked for changes to patent laws.
Jefferson embraced the republican ideals that came with the Enlightenment. He was the author of the Declaration of Independence, a document that is based on Locke’s Two Treatises of Government, one of many highly influential writings embraced during the Enlightenment. Jefferson helped design the republic that would become the United States, but he was not prepared for the way in which the common man took the ideals of equality and freedom to what he considered an extreme.
Jefferson lived to see the US republic slide into a democracy. In fact, he had a hand in it when he was president by making changes within the government that allowed it to become less central to daily life. This led to a lack of connection among the American people that Jefferson and others like him fought to fix in the early decades of the 19th century, first by attempting to make the government stronger and then by bolstering the religious community, despite his republican beliefs about separation of church and state. However, these attempts failed.
Toward the end of this life, Jefferson slipped into a kind of obscurity that forced him to list his accomplishments in public service in order to procure favor from the Virginia legislature. Jefferson was disillusioned by the youth of America and felt that what he had built was a failure because the youth didn’t see the republic in the way that he had envisioned it. Jefferson remained loyal to his definition of a gentleman—and therefore his paternalistic ideals—despite the embracing of republican ideals that led to his role in the Revolution.
American Literature
View Collection
American Revolution
View Collection
Books on U.S. History
View Collection
Colonialism & Postcolonialism
View Collection
Equality
View Collection
Nation & Nationalism
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Pulitzer Prize Fiction Awardees &...
View Collection
Required Reading Lists
View Collection