51 pages • 1 hour read
Fiona DavisA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Although Laura overcomes several hurdles to retain a spot in Columbia University’s Journalism School, once enrolled, she finds her struggles have only begun. Purportedly a progressive school for allowing women to study a traditionally male occupation, the school and its professors are not so progressive after all. On her first day, Laura’s instructor-turned-advisor, Dr. Wakeman, sends the class out on their first assignment: The men are to cover City Hall, and the women a women’s hotel ban on butter. Over the course of the semester, it becomes clear that Wakeman sees two kinds of journalists: serious (men) and superficial (women). It is only Laura’s inquisitive nature that leads her to more significant stories, like Amelia’s work with the immigrant poor. Wakeman praises Laura’s work and seems willing to let her write about subjects beyond typical women’s issues—tea parties and celebrity profiles—but turns out to be a plagiarist, failing Laura for a triviality and then stealing her work. When Laura challenges her grade, arguing that men are allowed to editorialize, Wakeman responds, “It’s different for them because their topics are more complicated” (203). Of all the women under Wakeman’s tutelage, only one passes—illustrating the sexism of the era.
Laura faces similar obstacles at home. While Jack is initially supportive of her desire to become a journalist, this support is contingent on his interests coming first. As long as the children are content and he has time to write, Laura is free to pursue her dream (although Jack sees it as a hobby). When Harry becomes ill and the couple discovers he has been skipping school, Jack blames Laura for not caring for the children, for not doing her motherly duty. Part of the insidiousness of patriarchy is convincing women that they don’t deserve more, that they should be content with what they have; after Harry’s near-death, Laura is plagued with guilt for daring to pursue her passion. She resolves to devote herself exclusively to her family, considering the pursuit of journalism a foolish whim. It takes several years, but eventually, Laura evolves into an independent woman with her own career. Only after Jack’s death and Harry’s disappearance does she find the space for personal transformation, when men are granted this space by default. Although Laura achieves her professional and personal goals, the toll they exact is higher than anyone should have to pay. On the other hand, Laura’s granddaughter Sadie is meant to illustrate the progress made between the two women’s time periods, as Sadie, while not without her share of conflicts, is living her dream and charged with curating an important exhibit.
Looming over both Jack and Laura are the specters of unrealized dreams. Laura’s aspiration is journalism, but Dr. Wakeman’s sexism threatens to derail this dream. Her failure to earn a degree—as well as Harry’s illness and Amelia’s rebuke—force Laura into her prescribed gender role, at least temporarily. Laura’s setback is exacerbated by her expulsion from future Heterodoxy Club meetings, which comprise many women who feel unable to voice their aspirations in a non-club space. For Jack, his literary aspirations push him to work long hours, ignoring his children and wife. His manuscript, years in the writing, is his life, and its destruction turns him into an abusive father and husband; the subsequent guilt and despondency cause him to take his own life. In both cases, the threat—or reality—of dashed hopes push these characters to behave uncharacteristically. Even Sadie, whose ending seems optimistic, struggles with her own aspirations. To a degree, she doesn’t know what her aspirations are. Though she was initially content to work with the Berg Collection, Nick Adriano shows her that life has other possibilities, which only confuses her and fills her with anxiety. Her self-imposed isolation after her divorce leaves her emotionally closed off, and Nick’s presence throws a wrench into her life plans. In the end, however, Sadie appears to have it all: a career and a second chance at love, the fulfillment of two dreams.
Having dreams and goals is essential to happiness and success. Without something to aim for, humans are left adrift and purposeless. Betty Friedan’s seminal 1963 book, The Feminine Mystique, addresses this very issue: Women who felt unfulfilled by their traditional roles as wives and mothers, who desired more from life but were trapped by societal expectations, couldn’t even articulate their dissatisfaction (due to factors such as a lack of formal education). Laura, while similarly stymied, can at least give voice to her yearning for an education and a career. Her restlessness finds an outlet in writing, but more than simply reporting facts, she is drawn to the tumult of social protest, to not only write about it but join it. When the police break up a protest—Laura’s first—she tells Amelia, “Well, that was exciting” (163). The protesters’ passion for justice, their defiance of (male) authority, only whets her appetite for more. Laura, with Amelia’s love and encouragement, realizes she can give herself permission to not only have dreams but live them. But again, Laura and Amelia are rare cases, as most women at the time couldn’t afford to chase their dreams (or even consider this an option).
Fiona Davis articulates the connection between past and present early on in the novel. Sadie shares not only a familial connection to Laura, but the New York Public Library itself; Laura once lived there, and Sadie now works among the library’s rare books and memorabilia. Sadie studies and catalogues the past, while Laura lived it. This connection doesn’t come without burdens. While Sadie is happy to use her connection to the iconic essayist to consider lobbying for a promotion (which she ultimately opts not to), at the same time, she fears rumors of Laura and Jack’s crimes will damage her reputation and career. An 80-year-old crime should not have any bearing on an innocent descendant, but Sadie feels the weight of her own history like a millstone; this weight is likely exacerbated by her being a loner, with no other connections than her family, specifically her brother Lonnie. She withholds her familial connection from her boss, Dr. Hooper, and when he eventually finds out, it only casts further suspicion on her: “I don’t like secrets, and it makes me wonder what else you’ve been keeping from me” (251). The only way for Sadie to lift the burden of the Lyons legacy is to solve the mystery of stolen books (including the Tamerlane theft of Laura’s time). Once the truth comes out, she is free from the anxiety of not knowing.
While Laura looms in Sadie’s past like a mysterious shadow, a real, flesh-and-blood connection remains in Uncle Harry. Long presumed dead, Harry turns up at Robin’s sentencing to confirm what Sadie has already deduced—that Robin is the book thief, and Harry is the link who led her to Lonnie and LuAnn’s doorstep. Past and present come together through an elaborate series of circumstances that allow Robin access to the library’s rare book collection. Harry, taking pity on the orphaned Robin due to his own past, fed her all the information she needed to pull off her heist. He fully understands his complicity in the scheme: “I blame myself, for all of this. For everything” (350). Sadie is beset by her family’s legacy in both the past and present, by both Laura and Harry. However, she comes to realize that her family history is complicated, neither fully good nor bad. Jack’s banishment of his son and suicide are tempered by Laura’s historical achievements, and Harry is the living link to both worlds; and like both worlds, he carries both guilt and redemption within him.
The value of history can be difficult to quantify. Paintings by long-dead masters carry great historical and economic worth, but as Sadie notes, “the value of a rare book is imperfect, fluctuating” (343). Only a single Mona Lisa exists, but over 200 copies of Shakespeare’s First Folio are still in print (according to the British Library), so experts must assess the value of each copy differently. Sadie argues that the real value of rare books and artifacts is not economic but as vehicles of knowledge. First edition books are the closest link the contemporary world has to the minds of creators and their artistic process. For those who see value in the past, like curators Sadie and Claude, such a link is invaluable. As such, Sadie advocates for harsher sentencing during Robin’s trial, as she wishes for the greater public to understand the value of such books. While this idea isn’t fully explored in the novel, the rise of technology and alternative forms of reading have made advocacy for physical books difficult.
Libraries, repositories of history, are a vital connection between creators of history and those who wish to study their work, as a creator’s process and the materials used to make first editions reveal a great deal about one’s life. The main branch of the New York Public Library is devoted exclusively to research, and the precision with which the caretakers of the stacks handle rare manuscripts speaks to their inherent (intellectual) value. It’s certainly true that rare books can sell at auctions for exorbitant sums—and stolen rare books for even more—but the fact that buyers are willing to spend large amounts of money only reinforces the books’ worth as rare objects of history. If a Shakespeare aficionado wants to read the First Folio, reproductions are available for a fraction of the cost of a first edition, but a first edition is too valuable and fragile to be anywhere other than a library or a display case, to be gazed upon rather than flipped through. Unlike original paintings, first editions often don’t serve their intended purpose (being read), but in a way, this makes them more excusive. In essence, rare books—including stolen ones—are worth so much money precisely because of their historical and aesthetic value. The Lions of Fifth Avenue dwells on these objects of the past with due reverence, and for the window they offer into the artists who created them.
By Fiona Davis
Books & Literature
View Collection
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Canadian Literature
View Collection
Family
View Collection
Historical Fiction
View Collection
Mystery & Crime
View Collection
The Best of "Best Book" Lists
View Collection
Valentine's Day Reads: The Theme of Love
View Collection