55 pages • 1 hour read
Mary Ann Shaffer, Annie BarrowsA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
By choosing to relay the narrative through letters, telegrams, cable communications, and notes, the authors signal the power of the written word to unify individuals across space and time. Events, conversations, developments, and actions occur outside of what is reported within the letters, whatever details might be omitted, the words the characters share form relationships and keep them whole. In The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society, the most important of those relationships are built around a shared love of reading. Juliet writes: “That’s what I love about reading: one tiny thing will interest you in a book, and that tiny thing will lead you onto another book, and another bit there will lead you onto a third book. It’s geometrically progressive—all with no end in sight, and for no other reason than sheer enjoyment” (21). The same kind of geometrical progression can be found in the relationships the characters forge throughout the novel, almost all of which revolve around writing and reading in some way. Dawsey first writes Juliet because he owns her Charles Lamb book; Mark tries to woo Juliet with flowers and then letters because he was fascinated by Juliet’s column as Izzy Bickerstaff; the Society’s inception is due to Elizabeth’s love of reading; Dawsey and Christian become unlikely friends because of their shared love for Charles Lamb’s writings; and the Society members, some of whom were not close before, become intimate friends thanks to the books they share.
Writing has the power to unify individuals from the past to the present and into the future. For an orphan like Kit, the words her mother wrote about her give her a glimpse of the love she will never directly experience: “Amelia—Kiss her for me when she wakes up. I’ll be back by six. Elizabeth. P.S. Doesn’t she have the most beautiful feet?” (269). Kit treasures this brief note because it captures the affection and delight her mother felt for her. Writing preserves emotions that would have been forgotten and offers comfort to the bereaved. Even impersonal letters that are not addressed to a specific recipient can carry significance thanks to shared human experience. During the harrowing experience of the Occupation, John Booker finds solace in the writings of Seneca the Younger, a Roman philosopher, because Seneca’s letters about enduring hardship prove that Booker’s suffering is not unique: “It seems to me that his [Seneca’s] words travel well—to all men in all times” (99). The written word, therefore, proves itself a powerful medium that connects human beings across generations and preserves their love, wisdom, and companionship for posterity.
Though the war has officially ended, The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society shows that for the people who survived it, the trauma and pain have been too cruel and destructive to leave in the past. For them, the war goes on within their bodies and minds. Though most of the characters experienced trauma, none exemplify the persisting effects of the war more than the character of Remy Giraud. Remy was sent to a concentration camp at Ravensbrück, where she experienced starvation and witnessed beatings, torture, and executions. Shaffer and Barrows demonstrate the way Remy’s experiences in Ravensbrück haunt her when she encounters a dog in Guernsey that resembles the ones used by German soldiers to scare the woman at the concentration camp. The dog triggers not merely a memory, but a visceral re-experiencing of traumatic events: “an awful gulping gasp: a deep gagging that went on and on. I [Juliet] can’t describe it. I turned and saw that it was Remy; she was bent over almost double and vomiting. Dawsey had caught her and was holding her as she kept vomiting, deep spasms of it, over both of them” (264). The reaction may seem somewhat misplaced, as the context of this encounter is vastly different from Remy’s memory of the concentration camp. But such is the power of her trauma, and while Dawsey and Juliet and the other Society members might be sympathetic toward Remy’s situation, her experience can only truly be understood by those who withstood the trauma with her. The authors, therefore, highlight how, for those who experienced the horrors of warfare, the official end of war seldom ends the suffering of the people who lived through it.
In line with dismissive perspectives on mental illness during the 1940s, acknowledging the ongoing personal devastation was commonly seen as selfish after the war ended: “‘Let’s put everything behind us’ seems to be France’s cry. ‘Everything—the war, the Vichy, the Milice, Drancy, the Jews—it’s all over now. After all, everyone suffered, not just you’” (260). The push to move on and not confront the trauma of the war is one even Remy seemingly endorses, as she fixates on reintegrating into society as a baker’s apprentice once she leaves medical care. But since Remy shows signs of what would now be diagnosed as post-traumatic stress disorder, the authors suggest that delving into new ambitions—while admirable after such hardships—is not necessarily a sign of progress or healing.
Another way the authors express the persistence of the effects of war is through the landscapes that were transformed by it. In Guernsey, the most notable disturbance the war has caused to the island landscape is the fortifications constructed by the German army. As outlined in the historical context of this guide, the army used enslaved workers to create the Atlantic Wall, often working them to an early death. The horror of the Todt workers’ conditions permanently altered the island, as Amelia notes to Juliet: “This summer, gorse will begin to grow around the fortifications, and by next year, perhaps vines will creep over them. I hope they are soon covered. For all I can look away, I will never be able to forget how they were made” (115). Though time will be able to scar over the damage caused to the island by way of natural regrowth, the authors underline how even so strong a force as time cannot fully heal the wounds caused by WWII. Similarly, while the people of Guernsey find ways to carry on with their lives in the wake of the Occupation, the wounds the war inflicted on their relationships are slow to heal. Adelaide’s attempts to smear those she believes collaborated with the Germans during the war, even after they have died, demonstrates that the damage the war did to Guernsey’s communities—psychological, physical, and relational—will last a long time.
Official narratives about historical events often enshrine biased perspectives on groups and individuals. In the case of Guernsey’s German Occupation, The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society challenges official narratives that characterize all islanders who formed relationships with German soldiers as traitors and collaborators without regard for the pressures the islanders were facing or the potential for individual German soldiers to be decent. The character of Adelaide Addison vocalizes monolithic, misogynistic assumptions about the women who engaged in relationships with German soldiers in her letter to Juliet warning her not to engage with the Society or anyone else associated with Elizabeth: “The Society members have colluded amongst themselves to raise the bastard child of Elizabeth McKenna and her German Paramour, Doctor/Captain Christian Hellman. Yes, a German soldier! I don’t wonder at your shock” (91). For Adelaide, anyone associated with the German army is the enemy and therefore evil. Her belief is not completely unwarranted, given the genocide initiated by Hitler and carried out by his arm. The authors are not claiming that the actions of the German army are somehow misunderstood. Rather, the novel suggests that portraying German soldiers as a singular entity instead of a plurality of individuals with their own thoughts, feelings, and senses of morality is too easy a simplification. As Sam Withers explains, “[A]s long as the Occupation was to last, I met more than one nice German soldier. You would, you know, seeing some of them as much as every day for five years” (217). War and the people who fight in it, the authors suggest, are rarely as simple as good versus evil.
To dispel the assumption that all soldiers were evil and everyone who had a relationship with them was a collaborator with evil, the novel’s characters recount stories of kindness and true friendship between the islanders and individual soldiers. Christian Hellman befriends and supports the islanders he lives among, and another German orderly steals sulfonamide from the German infirmary to treat Mrs. Godfray’s sick son. Similarly, the characters describe the various motivations Island women had for consorting with German soldiers. While some were attracted to the soldier’s power or physique, others used their relationships to provide food and supplies to their families, and still others were sex trafficked or sexually exploited. Such nuance reminds the reader that monolithic historical narratives can never capture the full truth, because they will always erase individual motivations and experiences. By gathering individuals’ stories into the book, she intends to write about Elizabeth McKenna, Juliet brings complexity and greater understanding to historical narratives about the Guernsey Occupation and WWII as a whole.
By these authors
Books & Literature
View Collection
Community Reads
View Collection
Friendship
View Collection
Memorial Day Reads
View Collection
Military Reads
View Collection
New York Times Best Sellers
View Collection
Popular Book Club Picks
View Collection
Romance
View Collection
War
View Collection
World War II
View Collection