logo

53 pages 1 hour read

Karin Slaughter

The Good Daughter

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2017

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Character Analysis

Charlotte “Charlie” Quinn

One of the two protagonists of the novel, as well as its chief point-of-view character, Charlie is a 41-year-old criminal defense lawyer in the present timeline. At the start of this timeline, Charlie is temporarily separated from her husband Ben Barnard, works alongside her lawyer father Rusty, and is estranged from her older sister Sam.

As a girl, Charlie was described by her mother Gamma as “pretty,” and considered gregarious, optimistic, and happy by Rusty and Sam. As a young girl, Charlie is an avid runner and argumentative which makes Gamma believe Charlie is born to be a lawyer. The baby of the family, Charlie idolizes her older sister Sam as a teenager, and also feels shunned by her. Charlie’s life is altered forever when Gamma is shot dead by Zachariah Culpepper, the novel’s antagonist, in front of her and Sam. Zachariah rapes Charlie, and Rusty asks her to keep the rape a secret even from Sam, in a misguided attempt to save Charlie from a trial. Charlie’s character is a study of how trauma can be amplified by secrecy, fostering a sense of shame and driving a wedge between those who would otherwise offer support, in this case, Sam. As an adult, Charlie shows resilience by becoming a lawyer, defending the needy, and finding happiness with her husband Ben Barnard. At the time of the novel, her unprocessed trauma is catching up with her, making her unable to move away from Pikeville and Rusty, and finding it difficult to maintain a relationship with Ben and Sam.

The novel characterizes Charlie as a woman working in a male-dominated world who creates a robust persona to deal with the challenges of this, In her job as a defense lawyer in proximity to Rusty, Charlie often encounters death and rape threats, as well as hostile, aggressive police officers. She manages this negative environment through her sense of humor and irony. Charlie is often shown engaging in rapid, funny banter with Rusty. Fiercely intelligent and loyal to her loved ones, Charlie also tends to be extremely reckless, often running into dangerous situations. The running into danger is a metaphor for Charlie’s attempts to reverse the past. The text suggests that as long as she keeps trying to change the past, she cannot move into the future.

It is the pivotal events of the school shooting and Rusty’s stabbing that act as a catalyst to galvanize Charlie’s character arc. Charlie is forced to reach out to Sam, as the sisters face the loss of another parent. Sam’s return, Kelly’s case, and Rusty’s death force Charlie to question the stasis of her life. She finally tells Sam about her brutal sexual assault. This is a watershed moment for her character as the telling releases the burden of shame she has been carrying. The growth in Charlie's character is evident in her decisions at the end of the novel. She reunites with Ben, decides to move out of Pikeville with him, and emails the photo of Gamma to Sam. This shows that Charlie is finally renegotiating her trauma, realizing that the burden of secrecy and shame was placed on her unfairly, and evolving. Charlie is thus a well-rounded, dynamic character with a definite character arc; her character is part of the novel’s message of hope and survival, even if emotional healing has been delayed.

Samantha “Sam” Quinn

Sam is the other protagonist of the novel. In the present timeline, she is 43, tall, striking, blue-eyed like her mother, and with hair that is completely white. The white hair is one of the many visible effects of the traumatic attack on her family in 1989. In the opening Interlude, Sam is shown kicking her way out of the shallow grave, an action which is also a metaphor for her resilience. Told by Gamma to always protect Charlie, Sam asked Charlie to run away, which made her attackers shoot Sam. Sam’s selfless choice shows that she is a courageous character but she also lives with anger and resentment at the effects of her injuries, and the fact that she thinks Charlie did not suffer violence. As a consequence of her injuries, adult Sam grapples with chronic pain, poor vision, anger issues, stiff limbs, and language processing difficulties. She often uses a cane to assist with walking. An expert runner as a child, Sam now uses exercise and physical therapy to cope with her constant pain. Unlike Charlie, who chose to practice criminal defense law like their father, Rusty, Sam has chosen to become a patent lawyer. The choice of career shows how Sam resembles Rusty and Charlie, but also departs from them. In her choice of career, as well as her personality, Sam is a foil to Charlie.

Sam is often compared to her scientist-genius mother Gamma. When Charlie finally meets Sam after decades, she mistakes her for Gamma for a moment. Like Gamma, Sam tends to look at matters logically, retain facts about everything, and has trouble fitting in. Although the tendency to rattle out facts may make Sam appear odd, her objectivity and intellect are great strengths. It is Sam who discovers Judith’s arm in the security footage and conducts a successful arraignment for Kelly, proving her intelligence and competence.

Much of the narrative’s emotional arc relies on the dynamism of Sam’s character and her reconciliation with her family. Though she blames Rusty for his work leading to Gamma’s death, she forgives him when he confesses his lasting love for her and Gamma. At the end of the novel, Sam too changes, ending her self-imposed isolation. She is shown to be in regular touch with Ben and Charlie, and chooses to view Gamma as an adventurer chasing joy, rather than a victim. The choice shows Sam too has let go of the past, made her peace with Rusty and Sam, and transformed. A dynamic and round character, Sam evolves through the narrative.

Russell “Rusty” Quinn

The father of Sam and Charlie Rusty is a complex, morally ambiguous character In the present timeline, Rusty is a 74-year-old criminal defense lawyer characterized by his tendency to adhere to his own principles. Rusty continues to defend alleged criminals, even though his liberal political beliefs earn him regular death threats. Seen mostly through his daughter Charlie’s eyes, Rusty is apparently a larger-than-life character, and his jokey demeanor and hedonism mark him as a happy-go-lucky character. However, Rusty carries the burden of terrible trauma, as he lives with the loss of his wife and the attack on his daughters in 1989, including his daughter Sam’s estrangement from him.

Rusty’s character arc involves the realization and regret for his request to Charlie, a dynamic character journey. He apologizes to Charlie’s husband Ben for his injustice toward Charlie, although he does not apologize openly to Charlie, reflecting his patriarchal attitude. Rusty shows he is capable of change when, after learning about Charlie’s sexual assault, Rusty decides to stop defending those charged with rape.

Harriet “Gamma” Quinn

Though Gamma is killed in the novel’s opening section, her presence looms large over the narrative, marking her as a key character. Wife to Rusty and mother to Sam and Charlie, Gamma is described as a genius. Before resigning from her job to raise Sam, and then Charlie, Gamma worked as an astrophysicist with NASA and Fermilab. Seen mostly through Sam’s eyes, Gamma is a tough taskmaster, pushing her daughters to excel. At the same time, she is an iconoclast, bothering little with other people’s expectations and opinions. Gamma resigns from a mainstream career, baffling expectations of a meteoric professional arc. However, she is far from a conventional homemaker, defying domestic expectations as well.

Despite her tough exterior, Gamma is a loving mother. Knowing that she is very ill, Gamma asks Sam to protect Charlie, a request which mirrors Rusty’s request to Charlie as a burden of responsibility. When the Quinns are attacked, Gamma is ready to sacrifice herself to save her daughters. After Gamma’s death, Sam and Charlie try to seek Gamma in themselves and her posthumous character in memory reveals their own thoughts and feelings. Although Gamma’s death is a crisis point in the novel, she also symbolizes hope, with Rusty, Charlie, and Sam holding onto her memories to get them through their trauma. The final image of the novel is Gamma looking happy and hopeful, reflecting the newfound positivity that her daughters feel at the novel’s conclusion.

Judith Heller Pinkman

Judith Heller Pinkman is the perpetrator of the present-time narrative’s crime mystery.

Judith appears in both the plot’s timelines. In 1989 she is a young neighbor who shelters Charlie after she escapes Zachariah Culpepper. Judith comforts Charlie and comes to represent protection and nurture for Charlie. She also agrees to keep the rape a secret, as requested by Rusty. In the present-day timeline, Judith is middle-aged, a middle-school English teacher married to principal Doug Pinkman. The moral ambiguity of Judith’s character is reflected in the contrasting ways in which the two protagonists perceive her. In Charlie’s eyes, the image of Judith as nearly angelic is further enhanced by the older woman’s cradling of Lucy Alexander after the school shooting, as well as her impassioned plea for mercy for the alleged shooter Kelly Wilson. However, viewed through Sam’s eyes, Judith’s presence during the school shooting is suspicious, as well as her decision to run into the hall and cradle Lucy.

Judith coerced Kelly to murder Doug as a punishment for Kelly carrying Doug’s baby. Judith’s criminal behavior can be understood as part of Slaughter’s critique of the effects of limited agency for women, especially within a particularly traditional structure, such as Christianity. Judith does not believe in divorce; hence, her only way out of a loveless, toxic marriage seems to be murder which, paradoxically, is a complete departure from Christian morals. The name choice of “Judith” is significant as the most famous Judith in world literature is the biblical woman who murders King Holofernes because he wishes to destroy her home. Judith’s character reflects the extremes to which patriarchy can drive a woman but the text does not justify her actions. Her actions toward Kelly are presented as more damning than her actions toward Doug; the narrative suggests little censure for the murder of Doug as a sexual predator but is critical of Judith’s lack of female solidarity and protectiveness toward his vulnerable victim, Kelly. Instead, Judith also exploits Kelly. At the end of the novel, Judith confesses and takes her own life, demonstrating remorse for her treatment of Kelly.

Kelly Wilson

Kelly's role in the narrative is as the true victim of the present-day crime. Her presence in the text offers an exploration of the negative cycle that is created by social inequality and the exploitation of the vulnerable. Described as petite and skinny, Kelly's diminutive physical appearance is a metaphor for her marginalization and vulnerability. Kelly is believed to have killed Principal Doug Pinkman and young Lucy Alexander, as she is found holding the weapon. She is scapegoated by the police and is the victim of both Doug Pinkerton’s sexual predation and Judith Heller Pinkerton’s criminal machinations. She is vulnerable because of her family’s low socio-economic status, educational difficulties, and the savage bullying she is subjected to by her peers.

The fact that Kelly could not go through with the killing and required Judith to pull the trigger shows Kelly as vulnerable and exploited rather than corrupted. Nevertheless, she is convicted of murder within a justice system that is unable to recognize her as a victim. Her character is emblematic of the struggles of youths like her, who Sam notes, often fall at the bottom of the social pile.

Zachariah “Zach” Culpepper

The antagonist of the novel, Zach is portrayed as an evil character, with no redeeming qualities. He is arguably the only non-ambiguous character in the novel. He is presented from the beginning as a serial criminal, even as a youth, and the portrayal of his attacks on the Quinn women shows him to have sadistic, possibly psychopathic criminal tendencies. After he learns his innocent brother Daniel was killed by the police, Zach uses unjust acts to secure hush money from the Huckabees. A flat, one-dimensional character, Zach is sentenced to death, and is on death row in the present-day timeline. Arguably, his continued lifespan has enabled him to continue his traumatic impact and fraudulent activities into the narrative’s present.

Mason “Huck” Huckabee

Initially portrayed as charismatic and handsome, Mason is gradually revealed as one of the novel’s antagonists, Zach's accomplice during the attack on the Quinns. Slaughter’s creation of Mason can be read as a critique of the entitlement of elites: Mason is male, white, wealthy, handsome, and ex-military, all of which give him a protected status that he uses selfishly. Mason paid Zach to kill Rusty, since Rusty successfully defended his sister's alleged rapist. Although Mason Is shown to be gentler than Zach, It Is Mason who ends up shooting Sam In the head. Mason also arrives too late on the scene to stop Zach from raping Charlie, though he does end up probably saving her life. When Mason learns Daniel Culpepper was framed for the crime he committed, he does not come forward with the truth, choosing to use his family's money to keep his involvement in the crime a secret. In the present timeline, he is an ex-marine turned history teacher who has an affair with Charlie. Even after he learns Charlie's identity, Mason does not immediately tell Charlie that he is "Bon Jovi," Zach's accomplice. Mason's ambiguous actions show he does have some redeeming qualities, but also that he lacks moral courage. He also symbolizes how wealth can be used to subvert justice. Though Mason does confess to hiding the murder weapon used in the school shooting, he gets a relatively easy sentence—a juxtaposition to the sentencing of Kelly which demonstrates Slaughter’s interest in the effect that social status has on judiciary outcomes in America.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text