logo

56 pages 1 hour read

Graham Greene

The Destructors

Fiction | Short Story | Adult | Published in 1954

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.

Themes

The Dangers of Populism

In the years leading up to and during World War II, the world saw many populist leaders, such as Adolf Hitler in Germany, come to power only to lead their countries to disaster. Since the Scientific Revolution in the 17th century, power had been shifting from religious institutions to secular ones responsive to popular opinion. People attended church less often, and intellectuals in the Western world were increasingly more likely to be atheists or agnostics. As a Catholic, Greene regarded these shifts in power with trepidation. Scientific advances and technological mastery call for moral guidance and yet they undermine sources of value and meaning. Ordinary people were gaining more say in government but had fewer moral reference points to guide the use of that power.

Despite being new to the Wormsley Common Gang, T seizes control with ease. He simply does some research, proposes a clear plan, and speaks to the gang’s vanity. Even Blackie, the thwarted former leader, conforms to T’s agenda when he realizes it will make the gang famous, even to the grown-up gangs. This new leadership escalates the gang’s activities from petty pranks to newsworthy crime. Even though the increased risk causes the gang to hesitate briefly, they quickly rationalize, as Summers does, that they’ve never heard of anyone “going to prison for breaking things” (7). T’s confidence and the thrill of fame facilitate this turn for the worse.

Before T’s leadership, the reader sees the gang put almost every issue to a vote. After the change in command, however, T no longer asks the gang for their opinions. He simply tells them what to do. When Summers fatigues from destroying the house and asks if they’ve done enough, T ignores his request and says they’ve “hardly started” (12). When Blackie suggests sharing the money that T finds in Old Misery’s mattress, T immediately decrees that “nobody’s going to steal anything from this house” (11). He not only decides what they are going to do, but he also instructs Blackie on the nature of reality: “There’s only things, Blackie” (11). The gang shifts from a democracy to a dictatorship—and they barely seem to recognize it. Greene may intend these passages as a reference to Hitler and many other autocrats who gain office through democratic institutions and then undermine those institutions to retain their grasp on power.

Later, power shifts back to Blackie, momentarily, when Old Misery returns and T’s plan becomes ambiguous. It would’ve been easy for Greene to remove this blip in T’s leadership, especially since Blackie and the gang quickly return once again to T’s command. Here, Greene seems to be underlining how easily power can shift when it is guided only by populist impulses. Leaders, cultural trends, and intellectual schools of thought come and go, and the gang (perhaps like the wider society) has no reliable reference point.

The Illusion of Order

Despite the chaos of their surroundings, the Wormsley Common Gang adheres to a strict sense of order. They meet in the same place every day. They hold votes. They have rules. They even have a leader. When that leader, T, proposes a plan, he first researches it. They are anything but anarchic.

When they vote to destroy Old Misery’s house, they begin by preparing. T puts Mike in charge of bringing large nails and a hammer. Blackie is responsible for bringing a handsaw and a sledgehammer. T breaks into Woolworth’s to get a hacksaw. Everyone is told to bring hammers, screwdrivers, and chisels. They meet at “nine sharp” (9).

Once they are inside the house, every boy focuses on his task with care and diligence. Summers rips out the skirting boards in the dining room. Joe heaves up the parquet blocks. Mike clips wires. Other boys saw the banisters on the floating spiral staircase. Blackie smashes the bathtub and basin with a sledgehammer. Once the boys complete their assignments, T gives them new ones. Their destruction of the house is organized and systematic. It proceeds in stages, and T oversees the operation with dedication. He’s even reasonable with his fellow workers and allows them to break for lunch for half an hour. What they accomplish, however, is pure chaos: “a shambles of broken glass and china” (10) and “a hill of rubble” (17).

This organized destruction is set against the backdrop of post-World War II London. Greene seems to remind readers that Hitler was democratically elected, at least in the beginning. Moreover, the Nazi invasions, bombings, concentration camps, and acts of genocide were all highly organized. None was slapdash or chaotic. Reason and technology led to the Blitz, the Nazi concentration camps, and the bombing of Pearl Harbor, as well as to the United States’ Japanese concentration camps, the firebombing of Germany, and the nuclear bombing of Japan. Greene gives ample opportunity to recognize that science and reason alone cannot create a just and peaceful world. They can lead to horrors as great as, or greater than, those of religious fanaticism.

The illusion of order—the compelling rationality of an irrational plan—can cause people to lose sight of what is truly important. Summers asks, “Why did we start this?” (12). He doesn’t seem to know; he has just been going along with the gang following T’s plan, which sounded logical. “The Destructors” encourages readers to consider that rational means often obscure irrational ends.

The End of Innocence

Though most of the characters in “The Destructors” are adolescents, they cannot be described as innocent. They use military language and are dedicated to order, rules, and votes, almost as though they were adults. Most of them are too old for games, such as bouncing balls on Old Misery’s wall. They organize themselves with impressive efficiency, and they never express any tenderness or concern for Old Misery. Indeed, they are distrustful of him and possibly all adults. When Old Misery offers them chocolates, they assume the candy must be dirty, stolen, or a bribe. They are so convinced ulterior motives lie behind the gift that they begin to antagonize Old Misery. First, they make noise. Then, they consider robbing him. When T suggests destroying his house, the gang votes to do it without debate.

If any innocence remains in the boys’ hearts, T plays a role in obliterating it. He puts an end to their childish pranks. He organizes them and sets them on a course that will gain the attention of even the “grown-up gangs” (8). When Old Misery returns early, T protests, the narrator says, “with the fury of the child he had never been, ‘It isn’t fair’” (12). It is this momentary relapse into childish whining that causes the boys to lose respect for him momentarily. Innocence is, in part, a kind of trust—a trust in the world, society, and other people—but the boys are so quick to distrust that they cannot be called innocent. Blackie even suspects the concept of “beauty” and considers it an upper-class word that should be mocked. The boys are distrustful, jaded, and malicious.

The only character who could be described as innocent is Old Misery. He does nothing morally wrong in the story, and to his detriment, he trusts the boys. He offers them chocolates. He doesn’t complain when they bounce balls against his house. He even offers to let them play in his yard on Saturday mornings. Unfortunately for him, he also believes he lives in a world where he should receive sympathy—not laughter—when his house falls down. It’s possible that by the end of the story, Old Misery has lost his innocence too.

The lost innocence in “The Destructors” mirrors the loss many felt after World War II. Before the war, battles were limited to battlefields. No one had ever lived in a world where an entire city could be obliterated with a single bomb. Many people never imagined anyone would drop such a bomb, even if it existed, or that a leader like Hitler would use technologies that had done so much good, such as railroads and biotechnologies, to destroy an entire people. Much of the world lost its innocence. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the Holocaust altered what many people thought humanity was capable of.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text