54 pages • 1 hour read
Carl SaganA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Each discipline of science has its corresponding pseudoscience; as an astrophysicist specializing in astronomy, Sagan chooses to focus on alien abduction and Martian "ruins" for his skeptical analysis. These two topics, which Sagan dedicates the next two chapters to exploring, “share the possibility that human perceptual and cognitive imperfections play a role in deceiving us” (43); the initial foundation of Sagan’s wider argument against uncritical thinking.
The belief that a giant stone face on Mars is the work of a vanished Martian civilization harkens back to the initial observations of Mars in 1877, when astronomers purportedly discovered evidence of canals on the planet that were evidence of a past civilization on Mars. In reality, these canals do not exist. They are thought to have been a “perceptual delusion” (49) by early observers, as later spacecraft missions have been unable to find any evidence of them. Still, the cultural damage was already done, as fantastic stories of failed Martian societies became widely disseminated in public discourse.
In 1976, when the Viking satellite sent back photos of Mars, several observers discovered what appeared to be a monumental face staring upwards. NASA quickly performed high-resolution digital enhancements of the images, and deemed the "face" to be nothing more than a geological formation whose cast shadows resembled a human face. Observers were simply falling victim to the human brain's characteristic of pattern recognition, which joins disparate elements into an image it recognizes. Our brains are particularly inclined toward recognizing—and seeing things as—faces, Sagan explains, as one of our earliest cognitive exercises as an infant is recognizing the faces of our parents and determining their emotions without any cultural understanding. This is why the "face" on Mars attracted so much attention and conspiracy theories alleging NASA’s cover-up of the truth.
Sagan suggests several experiments and hypotheses that could further determine the nature of the image, but he acknowledges that to those who believe, the most important aspect of their belief is that it helps sustain their sense of wonder, jolting them out of “their humdrum lives” (58). Sagan suggests that there are enough similar wonders in confirmable science, however, and that skepticism will allow these actual wonders to surface.
Sagan next turns to claims of alien abduction, which, according to polls in the early 1990s affected two percent of all Americans. Sagan points out the ineffective design of the polls, which renders their conclusions spurious, as the researchers didn’t even ask about abductions, but rather made inferences based on descriptions of sleep disruption. Sagan then questions if the supposed victims of abduction are recalling an external event or a state of mind.
Quoting John Locke on the fundamental importance of not building an opinion stronger than the proofs on which it is based, Sagan examines the proofs for UFOs, as of 1996. Sagan admits that, when he was a high school student, the initial claims of flying saucers in the late 1940s “seemed pretty believable” (68). In college, however, after coming across books cataloging public delusions and widespread frauds, he realized that there could be other explanations for UFOs. Given his new knowledge of scientific rigor, Sagan realized that witness testimony, which often forms the entire basis of most UFO reports, is not consistent or infallible enough to be the foundation of a theory.
Crop circles are a good case study to see how low the public's standards for evidence are—people are willing to accept almost any report to foster their belief in aliens. From 1975 to 1991, crop circles appeared, first in England and then around the world, with no explanation. They were widely interpreted as resulting from “a superior intelligence” (74), which most supposed was extraterrestrial. In 1991, two men from England admitted to creating the first crop circles as a lark. However, while their admission was covered by the media, this has done little to diminish the fact that crop circles are still regularly cited as evidence for the existence of extraterrestrials. Sagan suggests that the persistence of this belief is the result of a lack of critical thinking, the desire to maintain wonder, and unfamiliarity with the skeptical method.
As a part of the committee tasked with evaluating the US Air Force’s findings on UFOs over the preceding 40 years, including their flagship effort, Project Bluebook, Sagan has viewed the most concrete findings on the phenomena. Again he found spurious argument, poor investigation, and assumed conclusions. Physical evidence collected from the scene of the alleged flying saucer crash in Roswell, New Mexico, in 1947, points to Project Mogul, “a cluster of high-altitude classified balloons” (85) carrying radar equipment meant to scan for incoming nuclear attacks. Most of the physical evidence collected at other crashes, and many of the reported sightings, also point toward this major Cold War military initiative. Often, when people reported witnessing these objects, the investigating military officials encouraged them to remain silent about what they’d seen, fearing the Soviets would find out. This secrecy, Sagan admits, resembles a cover-up, but it also has a simpler explanation: wartime national security. Sagan urges that, given the fall of the Soviet Union, all these files should be made available to the public to dismiss the air of secrecy. (By 2022, the files were in fact declassified, revealing exactly the conclusions that Sagan posited in the book.)
Sagan investigates another “intersection of the conspiracy temperament and the secrecy culture” (88) of the US. When the Freedom of Information Act is used to gain documents relating to UFO activity from the National Security Agency, heavily redacted files often feed into the suspicions of investigators, who are quick to assume that whatever proofs they are searching for are exactly what has been blacked out. In fact, the plethora of redacted information is just as likely to be perfunctory or banal, redacted because of protocol rather than an attempt at obscuration.
The chapter concludes with an interstitial vignette describing the Aurora, a highly-secretive reconnaissance aircraft whose existence is unclear. Sagan briefly argues that exclusively assuming UFOs are extraterrestrial visitors is very limiting—they could just as likely be “time travelers” “demons” or “tourists from another dimension” (93-4), or secretive aircraft such as the Aurora could also be the source of these sightings.
Sagan explores how delusion works, first in individuals, then in crowds. His humanist approach begins with a discussion of pattern recognition, an inalterably human trait that manifests in our earliest reactions to the faces of our caregivers and explains the transformation of rock formations on Mars into a face. Continuing his tendency to empathize with the deluded, Sagan does not blame those who see the face. Moreover, he adds his own past tendency to credulity, acknowledging that, as a high school student when the first reports of UFOs emerged, he believed in their existence. Next, he zooms out to examine the cultural vocabulary around extraterrestrials, arguing that many accounts of alien abduction are individuals adopting elements of prevailing cultural tales.
In depicting the folly of individual thinking, Sagan also reinforces the idea that our perceptions can be easily altered, and therefore we must seek data outside of our own feelings. He portrays reaching this point himself: As he grows older, learns more, and conducts research, he suspects there is more than one solution to the UFO phenomena. By showing the steps of his development, Sagan depicts the method he is promoting, illustrating the proactive thought-process of skeptical thinking.
At the end of Chapter 5, in the interstitial account of the Aurora, Sagan offers the reader a chance to practice critical thinking, in particular the ability to hold multiple hypothesis in their mind while waiting for further evidence to clear up the picture. This underscores the fact that Sagan is not stressing solutions per se, but the way to use inquisitiveness to move toward solutions via skeptical thinking. More than anything, the skeptic must become comfortable dwelling in ambiguities, while practicing patience for the hard evidence needed for proof.
Sagan takes for granted the nonexistence of extraterrestrial UFOs, and uses them as a foil for his skeptical method. In recent years, the Department of Defense and the US Military have released footage of objects they labeled UAP—Unidentified Arial Phenomena—which seem to some to confirm the existence of UFOs, but which have mostly been shown to have simpler and less fanciful explanations. This new evidence encourages further use of Sagan’s system, working this new data into our skeptical understanding of the UFO phenomenon, and arriving at a new critical position on UFOs or UAP.
Appearance Versus Reality
View Collection
Education
View Collection
Middle Grade Nonfiction
View Collection
Nation & Nationalism
View Collection
Philosophy, Logic, & Ethics
View Collection
Psychology
View Collection
Religion & Spirituality
View Collection
Science & Nature
View Collection
Trust & Doubt
View Collection
Truth & Lies
View Collection
YA Nonfiction
View Collection