40 pages • 1 hour read
Friedrich EngelsA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Engels describes the horrific living conditions of the poor in London and other big cities. The neighborhoods where workers live are called slums, and they exist side-by-side with the wealthiest and most respectable parts of town, just out of sight of the rich.
The author describes several true stories based on local reports and newspaper articles to illustrate the appalling conditions in the poor parts of London. For example, in Spitalfields a widow and her nine children live in a little back room with no furniture. They all use a heap of rags in one of the room’s corners as a bed. They have no bedding and their only clothes are their daywear. In another slum a family living in a small room without any furniture is reduced to using a hole in their floor as a privy. These and countless similar stories illustrate the extent of the poverty characterizing the majority of workers in England. The author concedes that most do not live in quite such terrible conditions, but the possibility of being reduced to such a state is very real and always present, as there is absolutely no job security or other provisions in place in case the main family provider dies or falls ill, for example.
In addition to the vast numbers of people living in slums, there is also a huge homeless population, much of which is made up of girls and young women from the countryside. There are several shelters and boarding houses, but they are insufficient to meet the demand for beds each night and are also overcrowded. Guests sleep as many in one bed as can fit, regardless of whether they are men, women, young, old, healthy, or ill.
After examining the living conditions in London, Engels turns to Manchester, the capital of the manufacturing world, and its satellite towns in Lancashire. In these places the poor live just as badly as in London. The author has personal knowledge of the Manchester slums, where, for example, in a small basement room with no windows would live two families together with their animals. Similarly, in a two-room apartment, two families might sleep in one room and use the other as a shared kitchen. The streets in the slums are extremely narrow, lacking ventilation, fresh water, and infrastructures. It is impossible to maintain any hygiene, so there are piles of trash, refuse, and excrements in front of each house, and the smell, according to the author, is unbearable.
The working class’s terrible living conditions, however, are made invisible. In Manchester the central city is predominantly commercial with no one residing there. The factory and shop owners live in the newer parts of the city in nice large houses with wide streets and fresh air. The roads connecting the wealthy residential areas to the city center are all lined with shops in good condition, concealing the terrible conditions of the slums stretching in between these front rows of businesses.
In addition to terrible housing conditions, the proletariat is also deprived of quality food and clothing. Food sellers regularly scam workers, selling them rancid meat, for example. If caught, butchers are fined very lightly. Similarly, flannel and wool, which are the appropriate fabrics to wear in England, are too expensive for workers, who are reduced to wearing cotton. The poorest, such as the Irish immigrants, even walk barefoot.
In such living conditions, engendered and perpetuated by the industrial age, the proletariat is reduced to living like an animal, in the physical, mental, and moral sense.
Engels explores how competition initially created the proletariat and how it continues to impact working-class living conditions. He believes that the atomization of society, when every individual is concerned solely with his or her success, is a direct result of competition and an example of “all against all” (111).
The proletariat came into being when weavers’ wages increased due to higher demand for their skills, causing them to abandon any kind of farming and dedicate their time to weaving for wages. However, because of the constantly growing number of workers, in times of crisis, when there is no demand for production, their wages can be almost nothing because there are always other men without work who are willing to accept any payment, no matter how little. Furthermore, if everyone in a family works, they can survive on their combined income, even if every individual’s pay is lowered. In this way, to insure some kind of salary, even if it is the absolute minimum, individual workers are willing to accept smaller and smaller wages, decreasing the general average.
In times of crisis, if necessary, manufacturers can close down a mill or a factory and dismiss their workers to save money. This forces the proletariat to search for other income, such as begging, sweeping the streets, colleting dung, or pick-pocketing and robbing. Because there are no provisions made for the poor during times of crises, many people die from starvation or become severely undernourished and prone to sickness. The philanthropic societies and shelters are so few that they cannot support even half of the unemployed.
After a market crisis, when the demand for goods grows again, factory owners must rapidly increase production and, at such a time, wages grow as long as there are more jobs than workers. The British economy is in constant flux between these two extremes. Engels concludes that workers are treated like goods because the value of their labor is dependent on market fluctuations just like any other commodity and not on any intrinsic human characteristic. The proletariat is enslaved by the property-holding class, which uses competition as a tool to suppress and oppress the working classes by keeping them dependent on the manufacturers’ willingness to employ them.
The author briefly examines the role of Irish immigrants in lowering working wages. Engels states that because the Irish are used to extreme poverty—eating only potatoes, living all together in one room, often with their animals, wearing rags, and not bothering with shoes—they bring down the average wage rate by accepting payment deemed too low by English workers. In this way, the mass influx of Irish workers degrades both the wage rate and the general level of existence. Because of their poverty and lack of future prospects, Irish men drink too much and are content to live in the slums. They are often uneducated, coarse, and mean. Since Irish immigrants comprise as much as one-fifth of the working class, their bad habits are gradually adopted by the English workers, whose moral character and behavior deteriorates as a result.
Engels sets out to prove that the terrible conditions of the working class are consciously enforced by the bourgeoisie and, as a result, can be defined as “social murder” (128). He quotes a variety of sources, including newspapers like the Manchester Guardian and reports prepared for Parliament and the government.
Engels underlines that the crowding in the cities leads to chronic lung diseases like consumption. Other diseases caused by the lack of ventilation and the extremely poor housing conditions include scarlet fever and typhus. Furthermore, the lack of proper nourishment affects adults and also children. Most workers who are second- or third-generation proletariat suffer from scrofula and rickets as well as deformations caused by the too-slow hardening of the bones. The lack of physicians and proper medicines further damages the proletariat’s health. Mothers often treat their babies with opium and laudanum, thinking it beneficial, leading to a 57% mortality rate among children under five years old (137).
In addition to these consequences, the terrible living conditions of the working class also lead to moral problems, such as prevalent alcoholism and sexual license, which are the only two ways of finding some enjoyment and escape from reality. Furthermore, there is no mandatory public education, meaning that most workers can barely read and cannot write.
All these problems lead to increased crime, since workers who cannot earn enough money to live off resort to stealing, as well as suicide, as death can seem like the only escape from such a humiliating and degrading lifestyle.
These chapters graphically illustrate the real conditions of the urban working class in England. The author uses a variety of sources, such as his own observations, official reports, and newspaper and journal articles, to prove the prevalence of poverty and unmask the injustice done to the proletariat by the bourgeoisie. To drive his point home, he focuses on the most negative examples he can find, painting an extremely grim picture. His account is likely skewed, but his purpose in describing such terrible conditions is to denounce the “savage” and inhumane conditions to which a large number of people can so easily be reduced. He is not trying to do a scientific survey, although he uses tables and numbers to strengthen his account, but to rehumanize the poor and turn them into real people rather than statistics. It is unacceptable for people to live in the conditions Engels observed in England, no matter if, on a grand scale, they are not the average.
The author also points out in these chapters that most social problems, such as crime, prostitution, and alcoholism, are directly connected to the terrible living conditions of the working class. If their lives were not so grim, they would not have to resort to begging or robbing the rich.
By Friedrich Engels