40 pages • 1 hour read
Atul GawandeThe Checklist Manifesto: How to Get Things Right
Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2009A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Introduction-Chapter 1Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Introduction Summary
Atul Gawande begins The Checklist Manifesto: How to Get Things Right by recounting two stories he heard from his colleague John. The first story involves a stab wound victim who initially seemed stable. However, the patient began having problems, became unconscious, and had to undergo life-saving measures. The second story involves a cancer patient who flatlined during surgery. Regarding the first story, Gawande reveals that nobody asked what type of weapon caused the patient’s stab wound. Questioning would have provided insight into the nature of the wound, as it was deeper than a typical knife wound because it was caused by a bayonet. In the second story, the anesthesiologist did not realize that the patient had low potassium levels, and gave the patient too much potassium, making the dose nearly lethal. In both stories, care professionals were able to save the lives of their patients, but the mistakes made could have been prevented.
Gawande uses the two anecdotes to frame the focus of his book. He mentions how there are generally two types of mistakes: ones made out of ignorance and ones made out of ineptitude. He discusses how for most of human history, mistakes of ignorance were generally more common, especially in the medical field. However, as civilizations evolved and became more knowledgeable, mistakes of ineptitude became more common. Gawande outlines an example using a heart attack patient, listing all of the steps that must be undertaken in order for the person to receive urgent treatment in 90 minutes or less. The success rate of this process is less than 50 percent. Gawande mentions that even though humans know more now than ever, and train more now than ever, there are still many ways in which experts can make mistakes. He argues that one of the simplest, but most effective ways to ensure that people don’t make mistakes of ineptitude is through the use of a checklist.
Chapter 1 Summary: “The Problem of Extreme Complexity”
Gawande begins Chapter 1 with an anecdote. He recounts the story of a three-year-old girl from Austria who drowned in a freezing cold pond. For two hours, care professionals worked feverishly to save her life, both on site and at the hospital. Gawande describes all the steps that were made, and eventually, the girl survived after being dead for nearly two hours. He points out how much of a long shot this was, highlighting the pressure of the situation. Gawande discusses the discovery of penicillin, and how it was monumental in helping treat disease; however, as diseases evolved, new methods of treatment were necessary. As medicine evolves to treat new diseases, the complexity of medical professions increases as well. Gawande introduces the Harvard Vanguard, a clinic in Boston where he is stationed as a surgeon. He describes a typical day’s work as a surgeon, examining many variations of patient illnesses and injuries. He mentions that there are so many variations that computers have a difficult time anticipating them. In such cases, rather than selecting from a pull-down menu of ailments, there is an option for “other.”
Gawande discusses the intensive care units (ICU) at hospitals, which are used to administer “critical care.” He examines some of the responsibilities in a typical ICU, and provides statistics on how many Americans visit one of these facilities daily and annually. He then provides an anecdote of his own, recalling the story of Anthony, who suffered liver damage during a surgery for hernia and gallstones. The patient was in a critical condition, and Gawande and his team noticed other organs were showing signs of failure, including the patient’s kidneys. After 10 days, Gawande and his team made progress. However, on the 11th day, Anthony once again took a turn for the worse; Gawande discovered that the catheter lines installed inside of Anthony were infected. Eventually, Gawande and his team were able to save Anthony, but the infection increased his hospital stay, which caused him to lose his business. Even so, Gawande says Anthony was fortunate, as many things can go wrong in an ICU. Because of the complex nature of intensive care, and medicine in general, specialists must become super specialists. This narrow focus is encouraged to mitigate mistakes of ignorance made by someone in the wrong position. Still, superspecialization has its limitations, despite the success that modern medicine continues to achieve.
Introduction-Chapter 1 Analysis
Atul Gawande begins The Checklist Manifesto: How to Get Things Right by recounting two anecdotes provided to him by a colleague named John. The detailed accounts are meant to do two things: Firstly, Gawande uses the stories to provide real-world examples of how complex surgical care can be, and secondly, Gawande draws attention to how mistakes can be made because of the complexity of a job. In both stories, a key mistake was made, and in Gawande’s opinion, these mistakes were avoidable. He then pivots into a discussion of the two types of mistakes that people make, even highly trained, experienced professionals. The first type is mistakes of ignorance: People make mistakes because they simply do not know how to solve a particular problem. The second type is mistakes of ineptitude: While “the knowledge exists,” people “fail to apply it correctly” (8). Gawande seeks to reduce mistakes of ineptitude with the implementation of surgical care checklists. He follows a pattern of introducing ideas via real-world anecdotes, and then following up with data. In the Introduction, Gawande states “Studies have found that at least 30 percent of patients with stroke receive incomplete or inappropriate care from their doctors, as do 45 percent of patients with asthma and 60 percent of patients with pneumonia” (10). For someone with no inside knowledge of surgical care, such statistics are intended to raise alarm. Gawande’s choice of data justifies the need for intervention, which he argues is the implementation of checklists as a means of tightening adherence to protocol.
Toward the end of the Introduction, Gawande states, “Know-how and sophistication have increased remarkably across almost all our realms of endeavor, and as a result so has our struggle to deliver on them” (11). He highlights the inherent difficulties of professions that have become increasingly complex because of technological advances. In Chapter 1, Gawande examines how complex operating rooms are becoming: “Over the course of a year of office practice—which, by definition, excludes the patients seen in the hospital—physicians each evaluated an average of 250 different primary diseases and conditions” (21). The more patients who need surgery, the more potential there is for mistakes to happen, even in cases that end in success: “the average patient required 178 individual actions per day […] the nurses and doctors were observed to make an error in just 1 percent of these actions—but that still amounted to an average of two errors a day with every patient” (24). Still, Gawande gives credit where credit is due, and is not looking to indict the medical field by simply pointing out outlier cases. The added context of anecdotes and data is intended to keep readers, especially those who share Gawande’s profession, from feeling undervalued. Overall, Gawande reinforces urgency and reminds readers that complacency, while being a human trait, needs to be challenged. The complex work of surgery is inherently risky, making preventative measures crucial.
Related Titles
By Atul Gawande
