50 pages • 1 hour read
Octavia E. ButlerA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Powerful electronic collars that deliver agonizing electrical shocks to their wearers are a key device that allows Jarret’s Crusaders to overtake and dominate the Acorn community members. The collars symbolize the dehumanization of groups perceived as “other” and how systems of power rely on subjugation. Collars are most traditionally used to restrain and control animals, and the notion of placing a collar on a fellow human being is profoundly dehumanizing, signaling that they no longer possess any basic rights or freedoms. Collars have been associated with slavery since ancient times, and so the presence of collars at Camp Christian links the brutality of the camp to the history of slavery in America. The collars serve a logistical purpose of making it impossible for the enslaved to fight back, but because they are visible, they function as a shaming symbol of subjugation; as Lauren explains, “I’ve heard that some collared people kill themselves, not because they can’t stand the pain, but because they can’t stand the degree of slavishness to which they find themselves descending” (81).
The collars also symbolize how some individuals create feelings of authority and control by dominating others. While the Acorn community holds divergent religious views, it was never interested in undermining or fighting against Christian America. Acorn simply wanted to be left alone in peace. However, by targeting a group and subjugating them, Jarret’s Crusaders feel more powerful. Finally, the collars symbolize mental as well as physical control. The shocks are excruciating, but if someone is shocked enough, they can lose their memory and consciousness. For many people, including Lauren, the fear of this loss is worse than the fear of physical pain, which helps keep them obedient while imprisoned. However, the collars also symbolize how subjugation and control that is externally imposed will always be subject to being overthrown. Through a chance event, the collars shut down, and as soon as they do, Lauren and her followers liberate themselves. The collars allow for a very domineering form of control, but it is also one that people will never accept and always push back against and seek to liberate themselves from.
Throughout the novel, writing is an important motif, as characters write to spread their beliefs, process their emotions, and endure terrible situations. Both Lauren and Marcus spread their ideas through written texts that can be disseminated to their followers; a key turning point in the popularity of Earthseed occurs when Lauren disseminates her writings over the net so that more people can access them. After these writings are made available, Lauren acknowledges that “I’ve begun to reach people” (390). Even when Lauren teaches basic literacy, she uses simplified Earthseed texts to subtly disseminate the teachings.
In addition to using writing to publicly share beliefs and values, characters also keep records such as journals and write more private documents as ways of processing and coping. Larkin notes that “I suspect that somehow it helped her just to do it [writing], whether she was able to keep it or not” (236). Lauren writes journals during the horrible experience of being enslaved in Camp Christian as a way to maintain her composure, and both Lauren and Larkin express a need to write when surprising or significant events occur in their lives. For example, after Lauren unexpectedly reunites with her brother Marcus, she writes about the event in her journal and notes that “writing about it helps. Somehow, writing always helps” (90). Because of the precarity of the dystopian world in which Butler sets her novel, many characters cannot be vulnerable and openly share their emotions. Writing gives them a place to work through what is going inside themselves with a lower risk. By telling their stories and potentially sharing them with others, characters can hang on to a key aspect of their agency and humanity.
Dreamasks are a form of artificial intelligence device that allow individuals to experience immersive scenarios. They become popular among more wealthy and privileged individuals as a form of escapism and nostalgia. Dreamasks symbolize how entertainment can numb individuals to catastrophes happening around them and allow authoritarian regimes to maintain control. Many individuals retreat into Dreamask scenarios, which encourages them not to pay attention to what is happening around them. Len describes how her mother retreated into a particularly sophisticated version known as a “v-room”: “her own private fantasy universe. That room could take her anywhere, so why should she ever come out?” (342). Dreamasks not only encourage political disengagement but can also be used to promote specific ideological agendas.
However, Dreamasks also symbolize the resilience of human curiosity and creativity. While they ostensibly promote a rigid set of traditional values, the popularity of the character Asha Vere shows that people never fully lose their desire for more diverse stories and representations. As Larkin notes, “there was such a hunger for interesting female characters that, silly as the Asha Vere stories were, people liked them” (218). The ostensibly conservative scenarios are also quickly modified to serve other agendas, such that Larkin recalls, “I had my first pleasurable sexual experience wearing a deliberately mislabeled Dreamask” (276). By the time Larkin is an adult, Dreamasks are no longer strictly tools to maintain Christian America, and she ends up writing scenarios for them. This transition in the function of Dreamasks over time symbolizes how human creativity and desire for free expression ultimately tends to triumph over repression and censorship.
Lauren experiences a birth defect known as hyperempathy syndrome, resulting from her mother’s drug consumption. Individuals who experience hyperempathy syndrome are called sharers and feel any physical pain or pleasure experienced by individuals around them as if it were their own. This motif reflects Butler’s argument about the need for empathy and care in the world, especially among leaders. Because of the violence and chaos of the novel’s world, many people have lost normal levels of compassion and focus only on themselves and perhaps their immediate family. In this context, someone with hyperempathy syndrome emerges as capable of recalling the humanity of other people and likely to reject the violence that has become normalized for many individuals. Lauren notes that “The one good thing about sharing pain is that it makes us very slow to cause pain to other people. We hate pain more than most people do” (30). The hyperempathy syndrome experienced by characters like Lauren, Len, and David can sometimes make them more vulnerable (they can be incapacitated if they see someone else get hurt or killed), but it also makes them compassionate and able to maintain their humanity in a world where they could otherwise quickly lose it.
By Octavia E. Butler