logo

54 pages 1 hour read

Naguib Mahfouz

Palace Walk

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1956

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Character Analysis

Al-Sayyid Ahmad

As the central figure in Palace Walk, al-Sayyid Ahmad has a domineering effect on the narrative and on his family. He is a cruelly authoritarian figure who demands that everyone who lives under his roof must adhere to his strict rules. As a result, nearly all of the events in the novel are either directly or indirectly influenced by his family’s attempts to either adhere to or circumvent The Toxic Effects of Patriarchal Authority that he wields. Whether Amina disobeys him by sneaking out of the house or Yasin embarrasses him by repeatedly causing scandals, al-Sayyid Ahmad is surrounded on all sides by people who deeply desire greater freedom from his tyranny. Each member of the family is keenly aware of al-Sayyid Ahmad’s need for respect and obedience. They may not always provide this obedience, but they always offer their respect. Even on the rare occasions when they disobey or disappoint the family patriarch, they live in constant fear of his reaction and potential punishment. The pattern of the story is therefore predicated on how closely the family members can adhere to his demands, and he dictates the course of their lives through sheer force of will. As a result, al-Sayyid Ahmad becomes an isolated, lonely figure despite the control that he wields.

Though al-Sayyid Ahmad demands respect at home, he shows very different behavior to his friends and is known to them as a warm and jovial figure. Each night, al-Sayyid Ahmad goes out drinking. He also entertains a string of women in his extramarital affairs and rarely adheres to the strict principles of Islam that he demands his children obey. For example, he frequently imbibes alcohol, even though this is forbidden. The result is that al-Sayyid Ahmad, like many of his friends, lives a dual life. At home, he is harsh, austere, and demanding, and when he is with his friends, he is relaxed and charming. His life is defined by this hypocritical division, and he carefully polices his reputation to ensure that his family does not learn of his more relaxed public persona. Even when Yasin finds out about this double life, there is nothing he can do about it, as men like al-Sayyid Ahmad are so powerful in the patriarchal society of Egypt that they can afford to live double lives without fearing repercussions. That al-Sayyid Ahmad can be so hypocritical for so long is illustrative of the imbalance of power in Egyptian society in the early 20th century.

At the end of the novel, al-Sayyid Ahmad convinces himself that he and his friends have helped to bring about Egyptian independence. In reality, they have offered little more than tacit support and the occasional donation, but the movement is on the cusp of success due to the actions of participants like Fahmy. When Fahmy is killed during a demonstration, al-Sayyid Ahmad is forced to confront the loss of his son, who has died in defense of his principled stand on a political issue to which al-Sayyid Ahmad paid only fleeting support. Fahmy’s death reveals the emptiness of al-Sayyid Ahmad’s political beliefs, making it even more difficult for him to process his grief. Fahmy’s death serves as a reminder of how hollow and unprincipled al-Sayyid Ahmad’s own life has become.

Amina

Amina is the second wife of al-Sayyid Ahmad. After the failure of his first marriage, he places strict limits and demands on Amina. Neither she nor her two daughters, Khadija and Aisha, are allowed to leave the family house. Amina is confined to the house at all times, and her entire life is based upon accommodating her husband’s routine and making sure that his rules are obeyed. Even by the standards of Egyptian society at the time, the restrictions placed upon Amina are severe. Other women are allowed out of the house and can freely interact with other people, but al-Sayyid Ahmad feels the need to control his wife completely, and because she knows no other way of existing, Amina feels forced to comply.

Each day, she rises before her husband to begin her domestic routine. She works hard throughout the day, and when her husband goes out drinking with his friends and has affairs with other women, she waits dutifully until he arrives home and ensures that he is taken care of. Amina is so starved for genuine social interaction that she has come to love the interactions she has with al-Sayyid Ahmad when he is drunk. During these interactions, he talks to her as though she is an equal partner in their marriage rather than a servant who must prepare his meals. Amina’s entire life revolves around ensuring that her husband is happy, and for this reason, she ignores his hypocrisy. In her life of restrictions and impositions, Amina finds meaning in her children. Though they live under the same severe regime, the coffee hour meetings and family interactions provide Amina with a source of joy.

Amina’s life changes when she disobeys al-Sayyid Ahmad. While he is away, she listens to her children’s suggestion and makes a visit to a mosque. During this excursion, she is hit by a car and breaks her shoulder. She decides to be honest with her husband and tell him that she has broken his rule; as much as she tries to lie, she fears her husband too much to lie to him. After she is healed, al-Sayyid Ahmad tells her to leave his house. He ignores his own children’s pleas for her to come back until such a time when he feels that she is ready to return. Throughout this period of punishment, Amina accepts al-Sayyid Ahmad’s judgment. She never questions him, and she never again defies his orders not to leave the house. During her brief exile, Amina blames herself for breaking her husband’s rules. Amina may insist that she loves al-Sayyid Ahmad, but her love is situated in the context of immense fear.

After her return, Amina settles back into her familiar routine. She never leaves the house again and never comes close to breaking her husband’s rules. Her husband’s punishment is effective because it denies Amina access to her children. This form of emotional abuse separates Amina from the one source of happiness in her life and illustrates the level of control that al-Sayyid Ahmad exercises over her. By denying her access to her children, al-Sayyid Ahmad exerts a level of control that alters Amina’s behavior forever. She never again risks being separated from her children, as their presence in her life is the only thing that can truly bring her joy.

Yasin

Yasin is the only child from al-Sayyid Ahmad’s first marriage. He continues to live with his father and has essentially been adopted by Amina. She treats him as her own son, and he enjoys the same privileges as his younger siblings. In many ways, Yasin is very similar to his father, for his taste for women and alcohol mirrors the aspects of his father’s secret life. While most of the family knows al-Sayyid Ahmad to be a domineering and stern family patriarch, Yasin is the first to learn about al-Sayyid Ahmad’s love of women and alcohol. This discovery pleases and reassures Yasin, for he convinces himself that he is following in his father’s footsteps. In truth, both men’s love of women is entirely physical. Neither character respects women enough to treat them as fellow people; instead, they see women as a means of satisfying their persistent lust. Yasin therefore inherits a dull echo of his father’s misogyny.

The inherited aspects of this misogyny are evident in the disrespect with which Yasin treats his own mother. She is barely named in the novel, and she appears in only two scenes. Yasin visits her once to criticize her for getting remarried, and he visits her when he hears that she is dying. He does not even invite his mother to his wedding because he is embarrassed by her string of failed relationships. He believes that these failed relationships have caused a scandal, but instead, these supposed rumors of scandal are a manifestation of the deep misogyny that the son has inherited from the father. Ironically, despite their righteous indignation at Yasin’s mother, both Yasin and his father have a string of illicit affairs. Yasin also causes numerous scandals in the house due to his inability to keep his sexual desires in check. Yasin’s attitude toward women—and, in particular, toward his mother—demonstrate the extent to which he has inherited his father’s misogynistic attitudes.

Although Yasin shares his father’s hypocrisy, he struggles to win his father’s respect. While al-Sayyid Ahmad consistently praises himself on his moderation and self-control regarding his extramarital affairs, Yasin lacks any form of discipline. For example, he tries to rape Umm Hanafi and later seduces his wife’s maid. He knows that he may be caught and is fully aware that his behavior is wrong, yet despite the risk of inviting scandal into his life, he proceeds nonetheless, demonstrating his lack of control and self-awareness. When his father catches him, he disciplines Yasin. As evidenced by al-Sayyid Ahmad’s internal monologue, however, his son’s crimes against these women are not the issue. Al-Sayyid Ahmad does not care that Yasin tried to rape Umm Hanafi, nor does he care that Zaynab feels scandalized by her husband’s affair. Instead, he is horrified that Yasin cannot control his lust. To al-Sayyid Ahmad, Yasin’s true crime is his inability to control his own desires. Since he cannot exercise self-control, he must be punished. Thus, even Yasin’s failures serve to illustrate his father’s deep-seated misogyny.

Fahmy

Unlike his father and his older brother, Fahmy is a character with principles. He is willing to make sacrifices for what he believes and becomes devoted to the cause of Egyptian independence, even becoming involved in the secret political movement. As he becomes more deeply committed to political activism, he puts his own life in danger and occasionally finds himself running through the street with bullets flying over his head. Despite the sincerity of his beliefs, however, Fahmy feels the need to keep his political activism from his family. He is concerned that his mother will be worried, and he fears that his father may decide that such activism is scandalous. When al-Sayyid Ahmad does discover that his son is involved with the freedom fighters, he demands that Fahmy swear on the Qur’an to cease his involvement, but Fahmy refuses. Though he is consumed by sadness and regret, he cannot give up his activism. Unlike Yasin’s disobedience, which is fueled by hedonism, or Kamal’s defiance, which is based on his love for his mother, Fahmy’s rejection of his father is based on idealism. He demonstrates the principles that no one else in the family possesses, and he is willing to risk his father’s wrath to stand up for these principles.

Near the end of the novel, Fahmy and his cause appear to have won. People take to the streets to celebrate the seemingly imminent arrival of Egyptian independence. Despite this success, Fahmy has regrets. He feels as though he has not done enough to earn his place in history and wishes that he had risked even more for the cause. Fahmy’s reaction to victory demonstrates his idealism. Winning is not enough, as he must feel as though he has given everything possible. He doubts his own sacrifice in a way that is demonstrably different from any form of regret exhibited by al-Sayyid Ahmad or Yasin. The bitter irony of Fahmy’s self-reflection becomes apparent when he is killed in the demonstration just hours later. Fahmy dies a martyr, and his family must deal with the tragedy of his death. The irony of Fahmy’s principled stand is that his sacrifice is processed by people who have sacrificed very little. He does not live long enough to enjoy the product of his sacrifice, while those who sacrificed nothing must deal with the pain of his death.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text