logo

37 pages 1 hour read

Conor Grennan

Little Princes: One Man’s Promise to Bring Home the Lost Children of Nepal

Nonfiction | Autobiography / Memoir | Adult | Published in 2011

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Thin Line Between Safety and Danger

During his three years in Nepal, Grennan works tirelessly to keep the children he encounters as safe as possible. Despite his efforts, there are far stronger forces working against him: war, poverty, a disarrayed bureaucratic system, and child traffickers. For example, in Part 1, Grennan returns to the Little Princes Children’s Home to find an unfamiliar man leaving the property. Staff inform Grennan that the man is Golkka, the infamous child trafficker who had victimized all the Little Princes and their families a few years before. Golkka’s purpose for visiting the orphanage is to remind the staff that he still holds power over the children and their future and that he could re-traffic them at any moment. Grennan is frustrated that the Nepalese government knows of Golkka’s whereabouts but has failed to arrest him, which reflects the country’s feeble laws and enforcement system. Unable to protect the children from the danger Golkka represents, the author writes that “I found it difficult to control my anger against this man who seemed to be getting away with this, making a profit off the lives of children. It wasn’t my fight, maybe, but I wanted to join it anyway” (41). As a foreigner, however, there is little Grennan can do to keep the children safe in the face of Golkka’s powerful influence in the region.

Golkka is not the only threat. On every page of Grennan’s memoir, danger lurks in multiple forms. Grennan struggles to protect the children from disease, malnutrition, and the traumatic memories that continue to plague their young minds. In Part 5, for example, the author highlights a little girl named Leena, who arrives at the Dhaulagiri House highly traumatized from years of warfare and separation from her family. For five months, Leena refuses to speak, play, laugh, or engage with anyone. In this example, Grennan struggles to protect Leena’s mind from the dangers of her past. To encourage Leena to realize she is now in a safe place, Farid and the author provide Leena with daily care, including meals, human touch, school, and clean clothes. After many months at Dhaulagiri House, Leena begins to smile.

Grennan, as an American man, and Farid, as a French man, are less vulnerable to the dangers that threaten the Nepalese children and their impoverished parents. Nevertheless, even Grennan still tetters between safety and danger. During his travel through Humla in search of the children’s parents, for instance, he injures his knee and has a close encounter with some drunken Maoist rebels one night when he must stay behind because of his injury. With no access to doctors, hospitals, roads, phones, or airports, the injury immediately throws him into the path of danger. “I was as far away from civilization as I had ever been in my life, and I had no idea how I would get back” (202). Grennan risks getting stuck in Humla for the winter, or even worse becoming lost in the mountains and dying from starvation and exposure. Grennan is able to limp through his multi-week journey in the mountains with help from the porters and some strong walking sticks. When he is able to catch a helicopter and then a plane out of Humla, he returns to the relative safety that Kathmandu represents. 

“The Children Will Be Fine”

Sandra, the original founder of Little Princes Children’s Home, often repeats the phrase, “The children, as always, will be fine,” a sentence that provides Grennan some solace when he worries about the children’s welfare (47). Each time Grennan travels away from the Little Princes, he contemplates how they might survive without him: who will wash their clothes? Get them to school? Take them to the hospital? Ultimately, Grennan comes to the realization that the children’s welfare does not rest on his shoulders alone. Instead, “The children were often surprisingly independent” (34). The author provides examples of the children inventing their own games, eagerly completing their homework, and the older children stepping in to take care of the younger ones. Additionally, local men and women help to care for the children, providing them food, protection, and comfort. Grennan is not alone in caring for the Little Princes.

Key to Sandra’s message, and what Grennan comes to understand by 2007, is that in spite of the children’s past suffering, they are extremely resilient. For example, orphaned siblings Priya and Raju are deeply hurt when Grennan returns from Humla with pictures of the other children’s parents but not theirs. The author confirmed that Priya and Raju’s parents had died during the civil war, unlike the other children’s. Grennan takes the siblings aside to comfort them. “The three of us went upstairs to the rooftop, taking three small stools with us. I asked Bagwati to make milk tea for us. And I went through the photos again, all two hundred, telling them everything I could remember” (239). Although the siblings would never see their own parents again, they took solace in seeing the other children’s families.

Grennan discovers that he does not need to change Nepalese society, convert anyone to Christianity, or connect every child with their lost family. The knowledge of the children’s ultimate resiliency—that the children will, as always, be fine—makes it possible for Grennan to eventually leave Nepal and return to the United States in 2007.

The Wrong (or Right) Man for the Job

Grennan continually questions if he is the right person to be working to unite Nepalese children with their families. Grennan is an outsider who is an imperfect candidate for the task: he does not speak the local languages, he is an American, he is not experienced with children, and he does not have significant amounts of money to throw at the cause. The author’s feelings of insecurity wax and wane throughout the book, but they never completely go away.

Grennan’s self-esteem flounders most at moments when he fails to keep the children safe. For example, his deepest personal crisis arrives when Golkka abducts and traffics the seven children that Grennan had arranged to go to an orphanage. Acting out of self-reproach and guilt, the author quickly creates Next Generation Nepal (NGN) to begin collecting donations to aid in his search and rescue of the seven lost children. “To me,” he writes, “each donation was a touching display of blind faith that I could be able to accomplish something” (109). By taking money from concerned donors, the author feels two competing emotions: he worries he is a phony who cannot see the task through to the end, but the donations also provide a rush of encouragement. For Grennan, the latter of the two emotions triumphs.

However, his feelings of insecurity never fail to return. In Part 4, when Grennan finds the children’s parents in Humla, he feels unprepared to handle the depth of emotion that both he and the parents are feeling. “It was intimate and overwhelming and I felt, over and over, unqualified to be doing this job,” he writes. “But there was nobody else to do it” (193). Even after finding the children’s families, Grennan never considers himself the right man for the job. Instead, he just happens to be one of the few people doing the job. Despite Grennan’s outsider status and his insecurities, he continues to stay and work with the children of Nepal while attempting to keep his self-esteem in check.

One person who argues that Grennan is the right person for the job is Liz Flanagan. Liz’s daily emails provide a confidence boost for Grennan, which he is not always able to provide for himself. Liz points to her Christian faith as the reason for her unfailing belief in Grennan’s ability to perform the task of locating the seven lost children and reuniting the families. She writes to the author, “‘I want you to know that I truly believe that God wants you to find these children’” (128). The author does not address whether or not he believes that it is God’s will for him to help the children. What he does have unfailing faith in, however, are Liz’s convictions.

The Difficulty of Family Reunification

While Grennan faces many difficulties in finding and identifying the children’s families in Humla, the far harder task turns out to be reuniting the children with their parents. “Every parent was overjoyed to find their son or daughter again,” he writes. “But when they learned that their child was being well taken care of, they were suddenly reluctant to take him or her home” (266). The biggest reason behind the parent’s hesitancy to bring their children home is poverty. In Humla, most of the parents cannot afford to adequately feed, clothe, and provide an education for their child. At the orphanage, the children are receiving an education, daily meals, medical care, and a safe bed in which to sleep. The parents feel they are making the best decision for their children. In fact, it’s the same decision the parents faced when the civil war originally erupted in 1996 and they sent their children to live in Kathmandu.

Although Grennan understands the parent’s reasoning, he does not always agree with it. “We believed [the children] had a right to be raised in their own homes, in their own communities—a belief shared by UNICEF and virtually all major child protection organizations” (266). For their part, the children are also desperate to return to their parents, which “put [them] in a difficult position” (266). NGN cannot force the parents to retrieve their children. Instead, he and Farid attempt a few different methods to encourage the parents. At first, they tried to provide a stipend for families who retrieved their children. “As it turned out, by supporting a family under these circumstances, we were, in effect, rewarding precisely those people who had chosen to give their children to traffickers” (267). Grennan fears that neighboring families would also choose to send their children away in hopes that a western organization like NGN may ultimately provide the family money.

Ultimately, it is Farid who advises that they stop trying to force families to reunify on a fast timeline. “‘We cannot see the progress sometimes, I think,’” Farid reflects to the author. Grennan agrees, and they decide to let the children stay at Dhaulagiri House while allowing their parents to come and visit them. With this decision, Grennan is encouraging the families to move at a pace that functions best for them, not for him or NGN. “We were helping families become reacquainted after years of separation,” he writes (268). By fostering a slower reintroduction and reunification, more parents decided to take their children back to Humla.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text