logo

51 pages 1 hour read

Salman Rushdie

Knife: Meditations After an Attempted Murder

Nonfiction | Autobiography / Memoir | Adult | Published in 2024

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Importance of Free Speech

Rushdie has staunchly defended free speech throughout his career; in Knife, he uses his own experiences as a springboard to argue for the critical role that free speech plays in promoting freedom more generally. In addition to telling the story of being attacked as a result of his own public criticisms of religion, Rushdie discusses other incidents in which people have used violence to intimidate artists and intellectuals and curb their freedom of expression. For example, he twice mentions the 2015 murders of French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo employees, and details the 1994 attack on Egyptian writer Naguib Mahfouz. Because Rushdie, like many others, believes that such violence cannot be allowed to stifle free speech, he frequently mentions his own and others’ efforts to protect freedom of expression. In several chapters, he writes about PEN America, an organization dedicated to promoting and protecting free speech, and he describes the effort of the International Cities of Refuge Network to provide safety to those targeted for expressing their ideas. He often returns to the motif of gratitude for those who spoke out to support him after Khomeini’s death edict and expresses scorn for those who did not. Similarly, he describes his own public support of Charlie Hebdo journalists and severing relationships with even longtime friends who refuse to similarly defend free expression.

The memoir explains clearly why Rushdie so passionately believes that free speech is important and must be protected. In defining the role of free speech in promoting human freedom, Rushdie distinguishes between public and private beliefs. His unflagging promotion of the ideal of free expression, he notes, pertains mostly to the public sphere. He illustrates the difference in his Chapter 7 discussion of his own outspoken critiques of religion. Although many people hesitate to criticize religion, Rushdie insists that when religion intrudes into public life, it must be challenged just like any other set of ideas that do so. Religion should be left alone as a matter of private belief, but it can be dangerous if left unchecked in public life. He cites the Enlightenment as an example: The modern conceptions of human rights emerged during this time only because of Enlightenment thinkers’ willingness to critique the role of the Catholic Church (and its ideas) in public life.

Although Rushdie clarifies that “[a] poem will not stop a bullet. A novel will not diffuse a bomb,” he notes that artistic expression has an important place in combatting “the dishonest narratives of oppression” by telling “better stories […] stories within which people want to live” (180-81). Artists, writers, and journalists can speak out against oppression and authoritarianism as a kind of collective conscience guiding humanity into a better future—but they can only do this if they are free to challenge any and all ideas circulating in the public sphere. One of the primary functions of art, Rushdie maintains, is to challenge institutions and orthodoxies. Throughout Knife, Rushdie makes the argument that free expression is necessary in a free society. When writers, artists, and intellectuals are barred from openly critiquing society’s beliefs and institutions, authoritarianism and repression flourish.

The Power of Love

In Knife, Rushdie argues that love is a powerful enough force to overcome the effects of violence in the world. When Rushdie was attacked, he was in the early year of his marriage to writer and artist Rachel Eliza Griffiths. His relationship with her is a motif that he repeatedly returns to as he develops the idea that their love for one another allowed them to overcome the trauma that resulted from Matar’s attack on Rushdie. Eliza is so important to his story that Chapter 2, “Eliza,” is devoted to her. In this chapter, Rushdie tells the story of their meeting, evolving relationship, and eventual marriage. He praises her intelligence and her talents, and he reproduces the entire e. e. cummings poem he recited to her during their wedding. This background is highly relevant to Knife’s portrayal of the August 2022 attack because Eliza, and Rushdie’s love for her, were central to his recovery. Each chapter that describes the stages of his recovery—Chapters 3, 4, 5, 7, and 8—contains details about Eliza’s loving support and her own trauma following the attack. He explains how she rushed to his side despite the enormous expense of chartering a plane, how fiercely she guarded him and supervised his care, and how carefully she hid her own terror that he might die (a terror that he shared). The memoir conveys Eliza’s traumatized perspective on the severity of his injuries and his difficult path to recovery. The book’s final scene recalls the couple standing on the stage at Chautauqua, where Matar’s attack set in motion the terror and trauma that both Rushdie and Eliza endured, because this scene demonstrates the strength they lend one another and the power of their love to endure and overcome.

In exploring the power of love, Rushdie also credits his relationships with his sister and his sons for helping him overcome the trauma of the attack, linking this theme with another one: The Devastating Impact of Violence. Just as he describes Eliza’s support despite her severe trauma, he depicts the impact of the attack on Sameen, Zafar, and Milan. He recalls their visits to him and the efforts each made to cheer him up and help him process the entire experience. In the immediate aftermath of the attack, Rushdie’s first thought was “Somebody tell them” (16) and a desperate sadness at the idea of dying far away from his wife, sister, and sons. When it became clear that he would live and he began to think about how he wanted to spend the remaining days of his life, he had only two priorities: work and love. His determination to prioritize his relationships with Eliza, Sameen, Zafar, and Milan arose at least in part from his sense that their love had guided him through the worst episode of his life. In describing Knife, Rushdie explicitly states that it is “a story in which hatred […] is answered, and finally overcome, by love” (29).

The Devastating Impact of Violence

Knife considers the many effects of violence on victims and their loved ones. It examines how violence creates both physical and psychological traumas and affects both public and private life. The most obvious example of the impact of violence is Hadi Matar’s attack on Rushdie. In multiple chapters, Rushdie describes the physical trauma it caused through graphic details of his injuries and the medical procedures required to deal with them. He describes his eye, for instance, as “hugely distended, bulging out of its socket, and hanging down on [his] face like a large soft-boiled egg” (53). This image explicitly conveys the horrific nature of his injuries.

In addition, Rushdie describes the psychological trauma that he and his family experienced because of the attack. He repeatedly had nightmares and became uncertain of his own identity, questioning the path his life had taken and would take in the future. He felt frustrated at being drawn back into the time of the fatwa, out of the new life he worked hard to build. Once again he had to be on guard against both public criticism and the threat of future attacks. Similarly, his wife, sister, and sons had to confront the fear of losing him, disrupt their lives to stay with him, deal with increased security against potential future threats, and hide their own trauma to support him through his arduous months of recovery.

However, the memoir is not just about what happened to Rushdie and his family in August 2022. As Rushdie commented to Eliza when they decided to make a documentary about it, the attack symbolized something larger than just Rushdie and his immediate circle. Knife critiques violence more generally. It recounts multiple types of violence—including not only other acts of violent extremism by Islamic fundamentalists, but also violence associated with authoritarian repression and racism, and even the abusive violence of Rushdie’s father. The text portrays all of these forms of violence as anathema to human happiness and freedom. One of the primary arguments that Rushdie makes in this memoir is that people often use the fear of violence and its lasting effects to stifle freedom of expression in others because free speech is an important instrument in ending repression of all kinds. Knife exemplifies how people can use free speech to confront violence, reframe it, and reclaim the things it attempts to steal.

The Role of Religion

Rushdie believes that religion is a primitive attempt to explain the world and regulate behavior through the invention of fictional supernatural beings and forces invested in human behavior. He does not believe that religion has a place in the modern world, but he is happy to ignore it as long as it remains private. When it becomes a part of public discourse and is used as the basis for public policy, however, Rushdie feels that religion becomes dangerous—particularly in contemporary times, when modern technology can spread dogma and modern weaponry can enforce it. For this reason, he believes that writers and other thinkers have a duty to speak up against the uncritical acceptance of religious ideas in the public sphere.

Chapter 7 explicitly conveys much of this argument when Rushdie explains his beliefs about religion (for what he notes will be the last time). He discusses his beliefs about the origins of religion and its lack of utility in modern times, when science and individual conscience should be accepted as guiding forces rather than ancient, fictional stories. In addition, he draws a clear line between the public and private expression of religion. As examples of the damage that the public expression of religion has done throughout history, Rushdie cites the massive loss of life in India due to violence between Hindus and Muslims around the time of India’s partition from Pakistan, as well as the repression of women in the US as Christian fundamentalist ideas increasingly permeate public policy. Also in Chapter 7, Rushdie explains why freedom of speech is crucial in critiquing religion and why religion cannot be exempt from this kind of scrutiny, thematically linking religion to The Importance of Free Speech.

Rushdie threads elements of his argument about religion throughout Chapters 6 and 8 too. In Chapter 6, Rushdie’s characterization of Matar, his probing imagined questions about the genesis of Matar’s faith, and his arguments about the fallibility of religion all support his contention that religion is a fantasy and imply that its adherents are less capable thinkers than nonbelievers are. In Chapter 8, Rushdie explicitly calls religion “an ancient form of unreason” (201) that threatens modern freedoms. Here he clarifies why religion is specifically dangerous in modern times: Not only are modern weapons available to those who would commit violence in the name of religion, but his own attacker—like many others who have recently committed violence in the name of Islam—was radicalized in great part via the internet. Modern technology allows what Rushdie considers “disinformation” to spread quickly over vast distances to enormous, “malleable” audiences (202).

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text