49 pages • 1 hour read
Captain D. Michael AbrashoffA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Abrashoff again references his time spent as an assistant to Defense Secretary William Perry and claims that Perry was so highly regarded because when people spoke with him, he had a way of making them feel truly heard. Abrashoff, who views Perry as a role model, sought to turn himself into a great listener as well, though this did not initially come naturally for Abrashoff, as he realized that he was not naturally a good listener. Here, he introduces the first subtopic of the chapter, “See the Ship through the Crew’s Eyes.” He advises that in order to become an effective and respected leader, one should learn to take an accurate measure of how the crew views the job. In order to do this, a leader needs to make a concerted effort to really get to know those they supervise. Abrashoff details the ways he engaged his crew, beginning with personally interviewing all 310 members. The goal with these interviews was to get to know his crew on a personal level, which eventually led to an important realization for Abrashoff: He came to develop a deep respect for his crew. After hearing their stories, many involving some measure of real hardship, Abrashoff saw them in a human light. His respect for his crew paid off because they came to also respect him in the same way. Also, Abrashoff began to actively listen to his crew and their ideas and details a few examples of how the crew’s ideas led to a more efficiently operated ship.
Abrashoff pivots to the second subtopic: “Find Round People for Round Holes.” Here, Abrashoff discusses an experience he had while XO (second in command) on the Shiloh. Abrashoff points out that administration duties are an extensive and exhaustive aspect of the job. He had an assistant at first who was promoted to the job because of his level of seniority. The problem was that he did not perform the job well, and this made Abrashoff’s job more difficult. This assistant went on a vacation, and a temporary replacement, David Lauer, was hired. Lauer had developed a reputation as being insubordinate, which initially made Abrashoff weary. However, the quality of work Lauer performed soon changed Abrashoff’s perception of him. Eventually, Abrashoff moved to make Lauer his assistant on a permanent basis, even though he was not high up on the seniority level. Abrashoff suggests that performance matters more than seniority.
Finally, Abrashoff closes this chapter with another subtopic: “Use the Power of Word Magic.” He once more reiterates his respect and admiration for Defense Secretary William Perry. Abrashoff mentions that an additional lesson he gained from Perry was the power of language to help establish expectations and alter perceptions. Perry had testified in front of Congress that in his view, the US had the “best damn Navy in the world,” a phrase that Abrashoff modified and used as a kind of slogan for the Benfold. When the ship received visitors, the crew greeted them with the phrase, “Welcome to the Best Damn Ship in the Navy” (61). Abrashoff recognizes that there is no formal designation of such a credential; however, he uses the anecdote to illustrate his suggestion to leverage the power of language.
As the subtitle of the chapter suggests, Abrashoff’s primary focus is on the importance of communication. He details some of the initial strategies that he employed when he first assumed command of the ship in response to what he viewed as a relative lack of enthusiasm on the part of the crew members. He attributes this low morale in some measure to his predecessor’s unwillingness to create an atmosphere where the crew members could feel like their work had meaning. He also attributed the low morale to a general lack of effective communication.
One of his first strategies was to completely open communication between himself and his crew. He lists the various methods he used to communicate with his crew. The open communication was noticeable, as Abrashoff recounts a compliment he received from the Vice-Admiral of the Persian Gulf’s Fifth Fleet, Tom Fargo, upon completing the tour of duty there. Abrashoff mentions that his open communication was a departure from his predecessor, who was in the habit of openly scolding his crew. Abrashoff asserts that it is counterproductive both in the short and long term to keep employees in the dark even if this means revealing bad news to them. He sees this kind of open communication as a sign of respect that leads to an increase in morale.
Abrashoff provides an example of how open communication helped avert crisis. In 1997, an urgent situation was developing in Iraq. Because communication systems in the Navy were somewhat outdated, they could not share large amounts of information simultaneously. One crew member aboard the Benfold began learning the new system that had yet to be fully implemented by the fleet. Abrashoff soon realized that his radioman, John Rafalko, had it right when he insisted that the new system could be learned and implemented, which would help speed communications across the fleet. Eventually, Abrashoff was able to convince one of his superiors to listen to Rafalko, and ultimately, Rafalko’s suggestion was implemented. After the tour was completed, Rafalko was invited to join Abrashoff to debrief the admirals back in San Diego. Abrashoff says that his primary role in this episode was that he created an environment where people like Rafalko could demonstrate their skills, especially in urgent circumstances. Abrashoff then argues in favor of creating an environment where employees feel a sense of freedom. For his own crew, he would encourage them to be critical of even their commander (him). Abrashoff argues that while it may seem counterintuitive, allowing the crew more freedom actually helped foster more discipline on the ship as they came to invest themselves in the positive reputation the ship had gained. Abrashoff mentions that while off-duty and onshore, the crew of the Benfold never behaved in a way that was unbecoming. Instead, they upheld the reputation that they all had a stake in building.
Abrashoff begins the chapter by stating that developing trust as part of the workplace standard is essential. This includes having the ability to back off and actually exercise the trust. In this way, trust is earned. He then begins a discussion of hard lessons he has learned regarding the establishment of trust. To begin with, Abrashoff discusses the way promotion policy is set up in the Navy. There is built-in competition, which, in Abrashoff’s view, hurts morale because those competing for top jobs end up fighting against each other. This disunity causes real problems. One of the first things Abrashoff did to offset the potential damage caused by this system was to remind his officers that their careers had the best chance of advancing if the Benfold experienced success. Abrashoff then tells the story of a junior officer from another ship named Elliot who had been fired for being incompetent. He was transferred to the Benfold, where Abrashoff soon learned that Elliot was highly talented; his main problem was low self-confidence, which allowed him to be pushed around and bullied. Abrashoff laid the ground rules for Elliot and reminded him that mutual respect was a requirement for how crew members interacted with each other on the ship. Abrashoff’s work with Elliot brought out the man’s talents and also served as an example to the rest of his crew that even after screwing up, they can still have the chance to redeem themselves. This also fostered trust on the Benfold.
Abrashoff transitions into a discussion about revealing bad news. Leaders need to allow space for bad news since it could involve a matter of life and death. He cites two examples from the Benfold. The first involved problems with a new missile fire control system called Aegis. The crew noticed that the system was causing short circuits, which ultimately lowered the ship’s combat readiness. The second example involved fuel heaters that had developed cracks, which caused fuel to leak. In both cases, Abrashoff points out that a leader needs to be open to hearing this kind of news. In the second example, the crew member who discovered the leak essentially averted real danger. Rather than retaliate against this crew member, Abrashoff took him seriously and took the information to his superiors. As it turned out, the heater problem was discovered across the entire fleet. In response to the crew member’s discovery of the leak, Abrashoff awarded him an achievement medal without waiting for official recognition from the bureaucracy.
Abrashoff then moves on to discuss the nature of abusive and power-hungry bosses. He admits that sometimes there are bosses whose methods are outdated but still get results. He then highlights an offshoot of this leadership style in which the person becomes so motivated by their own lust for power that they jeopardize the overall organization. He urges readers not to become this kind of boss and to shield subordinates from these abusive people.
Abrashoff tells two other anecdotes to conclude this chapter. First, he asserts that being trustworthy can actually lead to more responsibility. The best way to pay that back is to keep doing what is right and put forth a good effort, because at some point, that effort will be rewarded. He says that the Benfold had been considered a key asset in the Persian Gulf conflict in 1997 with its acumen for deploying Tomahawk missiles. Because the ship was so reliable, it ended up spending 100 days in the Gulf, far more than other ships in its class. Even after its tour was up, and it was heading to Australia for some down time, Abrashoff received a request from superiors to intercept a smuggling operation that was on its way from Iran. This added another two days of duty. Rather than become dejected, the crew embraced the assignment because it reflected their reliability. The second anecdote is of Abrashoff’s friendship with a man named Irv Refkin. The two had met incidentally while at a dinner. Irv owned a company that repaired ships, including Navy ships, and had always done business preferring a handshake to a written contract. He also refused to have his employees punch a time clock. Eventually, his willingness to trust customers, including the Navy, landed him a large contract with the Navy.
In this section, Abrashoff further examines his leadership style and the principles that guided how he led the ship. Most significant in this chapter are his discussions on how he approached communication, which emerges as one of the central themes of the book: The Value of Listening and Communication.
Abrashoff admits that being a good listener was not always his strength. He discusses that one of the many skills he learned from Defense Secretary William Perry was how to be an active listener. Abrashoff points out that one of Perry’s most impressive qualities was that Perry always made whomever he was speaking with feel completely heard. Abrashoff carries this over into his command of the Benfold. As a baseline, Abrashoff says, “I decided that my job was to listen aggressively and to pick up every good idea the crew had for improving the ship’s operation. Some traditionalists might consider this heresy, but it’s actually just common sense. After all, the people who do the nuts-and-bolts work on a ship constantly see things that officers don’t” (55). Again, we see Abrashoff reference the traditional model of leadership, but he refutes this and presents a strong argument in favor of valuing the crew’s observations. Additionally, Abrashoff recognized that he needed to facilitate an atmosphere on the ship that would foster open communication.
In his initial interviews, he writes, “I tried to establish a personal relationship with each crew member. I wanted to link our goals, so that they would see my priority of improving Benfold as an opportunity for them to apply their talents and give their jobs a real purpose” (56). The interview sessions helped Abrashoff establish a culture of respect on the ship and that began with how he perceived his crew. The interactions led to mutual trust and respect, which resulted in sustained, open communication.
Abrashoff scales out his discussion of communication to the modern workplace and notes that a lack of communication between managers and staff “forc[es] companies to reinvent themselves constantly” (65). He is speaking in generalities here, but his point is to further highlight the need to value communication as integral to successful leadership. Open communication keeps everyone in the company or operation up to speed. It allows them to see things that are coming, even if those things negatively impact them: “Change frightens workers, and their fears thrive in silence. The antidote is obvious: Keep talking” (65). When employees or crew members can see the change that is in front of them, they can prepare and respond accordingly. They can also intervene with good ideas of their own. Because someone is not in the corporate boardroom does not mean they might not be sitting on an excellent idea that can help the company succeed.
Abrashoff discusses at length the value that he places on his crew’s input, even if they are critical of his own performance. This does not compromise Abrashoff’s control of the ship and his crew. Instead, it earns him respect. He contends, “Some leaders feel that by keeping people in the dark, they maintain a measure of control. But that is a leader’s folly and an organization’s failure” (66). Inevitably, with this kind of approach, employees will come to resent and lose respect for the leaders of the company. This is partly what happened on the Benfold prior to Abrashoff’s arrival. In contrast, Abrashoff’s fostering of open communication and active listening is part of a larger strategy that enabled the crew to feel respected and invested in the success of the ship.