88 pages • 2 hours read
Truman CapoteA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.
Unlike Dick, authorities house in a cell intended for female prisoners inside the Sheriff’s Residence, rather than in the jail itself. Undersheriff Wendell Meier and his wife Josephine currently occupy the house, and Josephine and Perry become friends over the next few months.
One day, Perry, receives a letter from Don Sullivan who served with him in Korea. Although Perry doesn’t share Don’s concern for the state of his soul, he seizes on the chance to correspond with someone.
In March, the sheriff finds and confiscates a shiv in Dick’s cell. Perry also hopes to escape, but his plans hinge on contacting two men who frequent a square outside his cell. When the men no longer appear, Perry fantasizes about killing himself.
Perry and Dick’s court-appointed attorneys persuade Dr. W. Mitchell Jones, a psychiatrist from the state hospital, to interview the men. The lawyers also unsuccessfully lobby to postpone the trial so that it would not coincide with the widely-attended Clutter estate sale.
On March 22, 1960, as jury selection commences, Perry and Smith prepare written autobiographies for Dr. Jones. Witness testimony begins the following day. The individuals who found the bodies are the first to testify, followed by the investigator who photographed the crime scene. Despite the objections of the defense attorneys, Judge Tate allows him to show the jury photos of the victims’ bodies. The day concludes with testimony from Floyd Wells.
Over the next few days, FBI laboratory technicians provide testimony regarding the case’s physical evidence. Dewey also testifies, publicly revealing two pieces of information damaging to Dick: that he intended to rape Nancy, and that sympathy for Dick’s parents motivated Perry’s attempt to alter his original confession and claim responsibility for all four murders.
The defense opens its case with testimony from Dick’s father, followed by testimony from Dr. Jones who says that in his professional opinion Dick can discern right from wrong. Although the court prohibits him from saying anything else, privately he believes Dick has a “severe character disorder” (340), and that tests should be performed to find out whether he sustained brain damage in his car accident.
Following testimony from Perry’s character witnesses—including Sullivan—Dr. Jones takes the stand again. On the matter of whether Perry knew his actions were wrong at the time of the murders, Dr. Jones has no opinion. Privately, he believes Perry shows signs of paranoid schizophrenia and that he committed the murders in a dissociative state triggered by a traumatic memory or association.
The defense team’s closing statements lean heavily on the idea that capital punishment is morally wrong. The prosecution, on the other hand, warns the jury that Dick and Perry could kill again if released on parole. After 40 minutes of deliberations, the jury convicts the men and sentences them to hang.
Perry spends the night following the trial in tears. Mrs. Meier tries to console him, but eventually must leave for a prior engagement, something that later haunts her.
At the Kansas State Penitentiary, Perry and Dick await their execution which is scheduled in six weeks. At that time, there are three other inmates on Death Row, including a man named Lowell Lee Andrews, a former college student who killed his parents and sister. Despite receiving a diagnosis of schizophrenia, Andrews is convicted as a result of the M’Naghten Rule, which limits insanity defenses to cases in which the defendant cannot understand the legal definitions of right and wrong.
The date initially selected for Perry and Dick’s execution passes while their lawyers petition for a new trial. Dick befriends Andrews, but Perry—threatened and humiliated by Andrews’ formal education—goes on a hunger strike. He grows extremely sick and only eats again when he learns his father contacted the prison to visit him.
Two years pass, and a pair of new men arrive on Death Row. George Ronald York and James Douglas Latham met in the Army and “found they shared at least one firm opinion: the world was hateful, and everybody in it would be better off dead” (373), writes Capote. They therefore went on a killing spree, murdering seven people across multiple states.
Meanwhile, Dick studies law and writes letters to various legal organizations. He convinces the Kansas State Bar Association to consider his complaints about his trial which concern the venue, the alleged biases of the judge and jury, and the alleged incompetence of the court-appointed lawyers. In a subsequent hearing, the presiding judge rules that Perry and Dick’s original trial was fair.
Andrews is executed on November 30, 1962. The other Death Row inmates are close enough to the scaffold to hear Andrews’ death. Before his execution, Andrews gives Dick a piece of paper with a stanza from Thomas Gray’s “Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard.”
Despite the efforts of two new attorneys, Dick and Perry are executed a few years later, on April 14, 1965. Dick dies first, followed by Perry, who apologizes for his crimes and states that he opposes capital punishment on principle.
Dewey attends the hangings, but they do not give him the closure he imagined they would. Instead, he recalls an encounter with Susan Kidwell near the Clutters’ graves a year ago. Susan told Dewey that Bobby Rupp recently married, and that she now studies art. As Dewey turned to leave, he reflected that Susan was “just such a young woman as Nancy might have been” (396).
One of the many controversies surrounding In Cold Blood concerns Capote’s relationship to Dick and Perry. Over the course of interviewing the men, Capote becomes particularly close to Perry. This created obvious conflicts of interest; the 2005 film Capote even suggested that Capote didn’t do as much as he could to help Dick and Perry with the appeals process because only their execution could provide the book with a satisfactory ending.
As inflammatory as this charge is, it is correct in its assessment of the executions’ importance. In Cold Blood is a book about the inevitability of death; although the particular deaths it features aren’t “natural” and therefore might seem avoidable, it approaches them from a strongly fatalistic perspective. The first Part is full of references to the characters’ impending fate, as in this description of Nancy’s actions just hours before her death: “[S]he set out the clothes she intended to wear to church the next morning: nylons, black pumps, a red velveteen dress—her prettiest, which she herself had made. It was the dress in which she was to be buried” (65).
At first glance, Dick and Perry’s situation in the work’s final section seems like the opposite of the one described above. Much of the tension in the novel’s first Part stems from the fact that the Clutters, unlike the reader, don’t know they’re about to die. By contrast, most of the inmates on Death Row have years to contemplate their fate. Nevertheless, Capote suggests that the two situations are analogous. Perhaps the only character in the work who truly believes and accepts that he will die is Andrews, and in his case, his equanimity is framed as a sign of psychological abnormality or, as Dick puts it, “funny thinking”: “[S]ooner or later we’ll all get out of here. Either walk out—or be carried out in a coffin. Myself, I don’t care whether I walk or get carried. It’s all the same in the end” (367). Elsewhere, Dick jokes about his impending death without fully believing it will happen. His parting words to Andrews—“I’m sure we’re going to the same place. So scout around and see if you can’t find a cool shady spot for us Down There” (383)—suggest that he sees his execution as inevitable, but he nevertheless remains hopeful that an exception will be made: “I believe in hanging. Just so long as I’m not the one being hanged” (387).
The issue of capital punishment also raises new questions about the nature of evil and how it should be dealt with. Many of the cases discussed in In Cold Blood involve diagnosed or suspected mental illness, undercutting some arguments in favor of the death penalty. For example, if Perry was in an unconscious “dissociative” state when he killed Clutter, executing him neither punishes him for his choices nor dissuades people from making similar choices in the future.
Issues of mental capacity aside, the work poses a more fundamental question: whether the intentional killing of another human being can ever be moral, even when it is state-sanctioned. Capote describes the process of execution in graphic detail, from the amount of time it takes for a prisoner to die after being hanged—up to 20 minutes in some cases—to the casual way in which individuals accustomed to attending executions behave during the proceedings. The overall scene is alarming enough that one guard has to reassure a reporter that it’s “humane” (392). This is not the conclusion the novel itself comes to; rather, the callousness of the procedure hearkens back to the closing statements at the trial, when Dick’s lawyer argues, “The law tells us that the taking of human life is wrong, then goes ahead and sets the example [...] [I]t doesn’t deter crime, but merely cheapens human life and gives rise to more murders” (350). In other words, as brutal as the crimes committed by Dick, Perry, Andrews, and others are, In Cold Blood suggests that they must be understood in the context of a society that practices and condones its own forms of violence.
By Truman Capote