18 pages • 36 minutes read
Emily DickinsonA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
One immediate literary context for Dickinson’s poem is Transcendentalism—a movement that occurred in the United States during Dickinson’s lifetime. Bolstered by New England writers like Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau, Transcendentalist writings favored a spiritual relationship with the larger world. They wanted to leave behind—transcend—the single self and become a part of something greater. In his essay “Nature” (1836), Emerson describes a rapturous moment in the forest: “I become a transparent eye-ball; I am nothing; I see all.” The emphasis on vision relates to Dickinson’s poem as it mentions “Gentleman who see!” (Line 2) and “Microscopes” (Line 4). A straightforward, non-satirical reading of the poem could include Transcendentalists in the group of Gentleman and turn “Microscopes” (Line 3) into symbols for the human eye.
Keeping in mind the tongue-in-cheek tone of “‘Faith’ is a fine invention,” it’s possible to read the poem as a challenge to the elevated mysticism championed by Transcendentalists. In this reading, Dickinson tells Transcendentalists their intangible “‘[f]aith’” (Line 1) might mislead, so they may want to rely on something more concrete, like a literal microscope. The satirical tone also relates to Utilitarianism—a 19th-century development in England that placed a premium on facts and rationality. Dickinson read the prolific English author Charles Dickens, and his novel Hard Times (1854) satirizes Utilitarianism. Dickinson arguably mocks Utilitarianism by puffing up the scientific microscope into “Microscopes” (Line 4). Then again, perhaps Dickinson’s poem shows that Transcendentalism and Utilitarianism are both useful depending on the occasion. Transcendental faith can be “fine” (Line 1), but in an “[e]mergency” (Line 4), a Utilitarian microscope is helpful.
Based on her handwriting and the type of paper used, Thomas Johnson believes Emily Dickinson composed her poem around 1860, which means she wrote it on the cusp of America’s Civil War between the Union and the Confederacy. Read in the context of history, the poem details the folly of humans—men or “Gentlemen” (Line 2) specifically—and their failure to enlist “Microscopes” (Line 3) to see the truth of the matter. The Civil War is the “Emergency” (Line 4) precipitated by the Confederacy’s abhorrent faith in slavery and way of life, as well as the Union’s past tolerance of it.
The presence of “Gentlemen” (Line 2) brings up the history of gender. Susan Howe’s seminal study of Dickinson, My Emily Dickinson (1985, New Directions), describes the gender norms of the poet’s time:
In the Victorian New England middle and upper class world of expansive intellectual gesturing, men gesticulated and lectured, while women sat in parlors or lecture halls listening (15).
Now, the “Gentlemen” turn into the lecturing, intellectual men from Dickinson’s history. Her speaker casts doubt on their insight and shows that women and people of any gender don’t just have to passively listen to what these men “see” (Line 2). Gentlemen don’t know everything, so it’s possible to contest them.
By Emily Dickinson