48 pages • 1 hour read
Heather FawcettA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
A key facet to Emily Wilde’s character is her preference to be alone, as she largely relies on her unique experience and scholarly intuition and is able to navigate some situations that others would shy away from. She is also socially awkward, making any attempted bonding or conversation very difficult and distracting for her. Yet, in this particular research expedition, her desire is outweighed by the necessity of relying on others not only to survive, but to make breakthroughs she wouldn’t have otherwise managed. As Rose says, “we cannot afford to be divided during this investigation. The nexus is too important” (90). Not only is the mission of academic and personal importance—Wendell would have likely died without her help—but it is Emily’s most dangerous expedition to date. As the dangers mount and the injuries begin piling up, Emily worries she’s “nearing some sort of breaking point [because her] experience with incidents this gruesome has heretofore been limited to secondhand accounts, dutifully recorded in [her] notebook” (123). To add to the difficulty of Emily’s quest, Wendell is too ill to help for the last leg of her journey. Quite literally, she is unable to succeed in her mission without the help of an entire team. Nearly every solo decision she makes, especially those against the advisement of her academic peers, ends gruesomely. Throughout the narrative, Emily gradually learns to welcome the help of others, sometimes in simply admitting that she’d be unable to proceed otherwise, and other times with genuine happiness to love and be loved.
Emily previously learned some benefits to reliance on others, especially in terms of the expertise held by the townsfolk, which makes her more receptive to social niceties than she may have been previously. When their host, Julia, and her daughters greet them upon arrival, Emily understands that she must “set [her] questions aside—[she] did not wish to repeat the mistakes [she] had made in Hrafnsvik. It was in [their] interest to befriend the people of St. Liesl, and that would be more difficult if [she] insisted on cross-examining them before [they]’d even exchanged pleasantries” (82). The locals prove instrumental to Emily’s survival and success in St. Leisl. Anticipating an attack near nightfall that both Emily and Rose do not foresee, a local named Anges and her husband arrive with a group of villagers to rescue “the idiot scholars who had tangled with the most fearsome of the local Folk, despite their warnings” (201). Emily both appreciates the help and feels immense shame when a villager is hurt because of her recklessness.
The research expedition to St. Leisl represents a change in Emily’s past expeditions. She’s not alone as usual, but with the added company of her potential fiancé, the dryadology Department Head, and her biological niece. Having an actual family member present on such a dangerous expedition is new territory for Emily, especially as she’s never had any close family who’s been interested in knowing her intimately. Emily has the added stress of ensuring Ariadne’s personal safety—a responsibility she doesn’t quite know how to handle. Therefore, she ends up relying on the enchanted scarf Wendell gifts Ariadne for her protection. She appreciates the gesture so much that it prompts her to kiss Wendell for the first time since Ljosland.
While Emily believes the young Ariadne to be adept and intelligent, she spends most of her time scolding her and warning her of potential danger rather than trusting her. As it turns out, Ariadne understands before Emily that the faun foot she carries around is the cause for the scratches at their doorstep. Additionally, Ariadne accompanies Emily into the Silva Lupi realm despite Emily’s protestations. In the nights spent inside his dangerous realm, Emily can’t help noting “that [she] would not be sleeping at all if not for Ariadne’s company, or at least not without significant risk” (246). Ariadne’s aid proves invaluable to Emily, who would not have relied on her without her unrelenting insistence.
According to the dryadology field, arrogance is an oft-exploited weakness of the Folk; as Emily states “if there is one fault universal to faerie monarchs, it is overconfidence” (284). However, the dangers of arrogance do not pertain only to them. As Emily mentions at the beginning of the novel, “While many scholars have had interactions with the common fae—household brownies and the like—few have encountered courtly fae and lived to tell of it” (50). The fact that she has done so not once but several times, and even has a genuine marriage proposal from one such courtly fae causes her to behave with overconfidence in the matters of the Folk. This furthers her unique connection to the Folk and separates her from average humans, imbuing her with Fae-like qualities. Arrogance is repeatedly addressed as an ignorant behavior, whether associated with Emily, Wendell, or the courtly fae.
Emily’s peers frequently warn her about the dangers of her arrogance. When Emily states that inhabitants of “humble” faerie abodes in St. Leisl might prove useful, Wendell replies, “‘You were lucky with Poe. Your luck will run out if you aren’t careful” (86). Since making a lucky meaningful connection with Poe, Emily has become more reckless with seeking out the Folk and attempting to make trusting relationships. When Emily exhibits extreme arrogance by wanting to remain outside after nightfall despite the locals’ warnings about the nocturnal Folk, Wendell speaks up once again: “’You shouldn’t take the danger so lightly, Em—there are Folk in this world so vicious the mortal mind cannot fathom it, so ghastly you would spend a lifetime yearning to forget a single glimpse of their countenance’” (100). Though she begrudgingly relents, it does not stop her from attempting to remain outside past nightfall later on, which ends in an attack that accidentally causes Shadow to harm a local he mistakes for a malicious faerie.
Emily has also been highly successful with following her intuition. What she doesn’t yet realize is that her intuition has since been affected by her recent romantic developments; there is an underlying subjectivity to this research mission in particular that will cause her to mistake desperation for intuition. Rose highlights this by providing his own unbiased opinions to the expedition, stating upon arrival that, “‘we will interview the townsfolk first […] No doubt they will know the locations of a number of doors, and we must proceed scientifically, from the known to the unknown. It would be foolish to base our research on your intuition, Emily’” (90). She continues to ignore Rose’s advice, which leads them into a dangerous situation only Emily is adequately protected from due to her enchanted cloak and Shadow’s company. Rose is left to fend for himself against the tree faun, which grotesquely disfigures him. Emily later says to Wendell when begging him to heal Rose, “We were careless today, Rose and I. You were right about the common fae, and I was wrong” (123). Her underestimation of the Folk inhabiting the area brought Rose into near-fatal danger, illustrating the very real dangers of her arrogance.
At the start of the novel, Wendell’s marriage proposal still hangs over Emily’s head; as their search for his door continues, Emily must determine how to balance academic objectivity with her newfound emotional subjectivity for Wendell and her increasing circle of peers. Wendell says to Rose early on that “Emily is puritanical in matters of professional integrity. It’s her only bad quality” (104). This statement prefaces the growing conflict that is the direct opposition between academia and romance—the former requires total objectivity, whereas the latter will wither and die without subjectivity. Prior to leaving for the St. Leisl expedition, Emily and Wendell share an intimate moment where she withdraws her hand from his and says, “Of course I care about your door. It is one of the most interesting mysteries I have encountered in my career, and I intend to solve it. You know how I am” (21). While this statement might be true, Emily’s flustered reaction to Wendell’s proximity hints at the conflation between her scholarly impartiality and her romantic bias which will prove disastrous to the coming expedition.
As an academic, objectivity is imperative to research and a foundational aspect of her methods. However, the trip to St. Leisl proves challenging in this regard, as not only does Emily have personal stakes in the expedition due to Wendell and his failing health, but her other companions. Dr. Farris Rose, the dryadology Department Head whom she begrudgingly admires, expresses near-fatherly concern over Emily’s well-being and pride in her career. Rose shows increasing concern for Emily’s lack of objectivity with the Folk and as a serious dryadologist himself, is unafraid to warn her of how this might impact her career. Fairly early on, he witnesses her lack of levelheadedness when Wendell continues to worsen from the poison and says to her, “Emily, I may have doubts about your methods, but I have always thought you an intelligent person. Yet you are behaving like an utter fool” (70). Emily battles with the desire to impress the department head who previously attempted to fire her for improper research and her personal desperation to save Wendell at all costs. Ariadne, her 19-year-old niece and the only family member with interest in intimately knowing Emily, is another point of subjectivity for the mission. As much as Emily tries to remain impartial, as time goes on, Ariadne becomes a very important person whose safety Emily worries over. Over the course of the novel, Emily puts aside giving Ariadne dryadology field experience in order to keep her niece safe, prioritizing her subjective and sentimental attachment to Ariadne over her previous commitment to acquiring knowledge at any cost.