62 pages • 2 hours read
Aldous HuxleyA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
This chapter begins with a description of the beds at Crome, all of which are ancient, beautiful pieces of furniture. The most magnificent bed, which belongs to Anne, was built by Sir Julius, the son of Crome’s founder. Sir Julius had the bed designed in and shipped from Venice for the birth of his first child. It is decorated with roses, cherubs, and gilded reliefs and includes a wooden canopy with more flower carvings.
That night, Anne lies in bed reading by candlelight. Mary knocks on the door softly, telling Anne she came to say goodnight. She sits on the edge of the bed and says Anne’s book is “second-rate” (32). Living in London has accustomed Mary to appreciating only first-rate things, and she believes that of the very few first-rate things in the world, most are French. Anne says she is enjoying the book, and an uncomfortable silence descends. Mary suddenly says she is very afraid of repressions. Anne mistakes this for “depressions,” but Mary corrects her and says she is afraid of her sexual instincts being repressed. She says she has started to recognize symptoms of sexual repression in herself, including frequent dreams about climbing up ladders or falling down wells, and has become afraid of becoming a nymphomaniac if she does not free herself. Anne is unsure how she can help, and Mary tells her that simply talking through these problems will be helpful.
Mary asks Anne whether she has any prejudices, and Anne admits that she does have some, but not about repressions or how to get rid of them. They agree that marriage is ultimately a desirable state in which one can articulate one’s repressions and be free from them. Anne says that Mary should share this information with someone she is in love with, but Mary says she is not in love with anyone. Anne tells her that to stop the nightmares, she has to find someone and fall in love with them. Pondering who this could be, Mary says she needs someone intelligent who respects women and is prepared to talk seriously about his work and ideas. Anne says there are several single men at Crome but that Mr. Scogan is too old, so Mary’s choice is between Gombauld and Denis. Mary has assumed Anne was interested in one or both of them, but Anne says she is not. Mary concludes that Gombauld is more talented but less civilized than Denis, and Denis is serious-minded but too much of a dilettante.
Anne refuses to help her reach a conclusion, saying that Mary has to choose. Mary says good night, and as she leaves, she notes Anne’s curious, unreadable smile. Anne says she hopes Mary will not have more bad dreams, and they agree that dreams about climbing ladders are far worse than dreams about falling down wells.
At Sunday morning breakfast, Priscilla reads in the paper that Surrey won a recent cricket game and attributes this victory to the sun being in Leo. Mr. Barbecue-Smith says that cricket is a very English game; Jenny mishears this and thinks he is asking her if she is English, to which she indignantly replies that she is. Priscilla tells Mr. Barbecue-Smith about a series of articles describing the next world, which will be known as “Summer Land and Gehenna” (36).
Mary enters and sits next to Denis, who she decided the previous night would be the man she pursues. While he is less talented than Gombauld, she sees him as a safer option. She asks him if he has been writing poetry lately, and he tells her curtly that he has not, as he does not have his typewriter. Mary tries to continue the conversation, but Denis wants to listen to Mr. Scogan, who is describing his plan for dealing with problems in the Church of England. He claims that requiring members of the clergy to wear their clothes and shoes backwards—and thus looking smooth and plain to the rest of the world—would prevent new people from entering the Church and enhance the beauty of holiness.
Priscilla and Mr. Barbecue-Smith continue talking about Summer Land and Gehenna. Mr. Barbecue-Smith assures Priscilla that the articles’ depiction of children flaying lambs alive in Hell is simply metaphorical. When he tries to explain what the lambs symbolize, Mr. Scogan talks over him, comparing his plan for the Church to the military’s standardization of plain uniforms and abandonment of accessories and decorations.
Henry enters and asks if anyone wants to attend the local church service with him. He says that the local reverend’s sermons are “sometimes worth hearing” (37). Mr. Barbecue-Smith declines, saying he prefers to worship in nature. He tries to quote a line from a Shakespearean play but does not know how the line ends.
Mr. Bodiham, the local reverend, sits in the study of his rectory. The room is full of brown furniture, the carpet is a brownish-red shade, and there is even a brown smell to the space. Mr. Bodiham has a narrow, hard face, small eyes, wiry hair, and a harsh voice. He has just returned from the church service, where he preached with a fiery passion, but those in attendance seemed uninterested. In his sermon, he tried to make them understand that God was not the compassionate, merciful being they imagined and argued that they are blinding themselves to the truth of God’s nature. But his most enthusiastic sermons are only ever met with polite stares, including from Henry Wimbush, who always sits in the front pew, beautifully dressed.
Mr. Bodiham remembers that it has been four years since his sermon on Matthew 24:7, a verse that says nations will rise up against each other and that famines, earthquakes, and pestilence will follow. He had the sermon printed as a pamphlet and begins rereading an old copy. It states that in the 19 centuries that have passed since Christ’s death, many kingdoms have fallen, diseases have swept away huge populations, and natural disasters have claimed many lives. None of these was a sign of Christ’s return; all were instead signs of God’s anger at mankind’s sinfulness. However, the current war actually is a sign of Christ’s imminent return because it shares a number of characteristics with other depictions of the Second Coming throughout Christian prophecy. One such sign is the increase in Christian evangelism around the world, and another is the fall of the Ottoman Empire, which Mr. Bodiham believes was prophesied in the Book of Revelations as the drying up of the Euphrates River.
Revelations also contains a prophecy of Armageddon that includes a destructive war, and Mr. Bodiham’s pamphlet breaks down the individual components of this prophecy even further. The passage claims Armageddon will be brought about by “the Dragon, the Beast, and the False Prophet” (41). He argues that the Dragon represents Rome, the Beast represents the Pope and the Catholic Church, and False Prophet refers to the Jesuits, a Catholic religious order. He also refers to these three figures as “Infidelity, Popery, and False Morality” (41). In the context of the modern world, Mr. Bodiham argues that infidelity is embodied in German Higher Criticism, a philosophical position that denies the existence of miracles and divine inspiration; popery is embodied in the Franco-Prussian War, a conflict Mr. Bodiham sees as orchestrated by Catholic powers; and false morality is embodied in Germany’s devotion to generally unchristian views and the way those views are applied to international politics. The sermon concludes by stating that after Christ’s return, those who opposed him will learn that a vengeful God exists alongside a forgiving God.
Mr. Bodiham feels satisfied with his sermon, believing his argument to be strong and convincing. However, four years later, the people of Crome are still sinful and do not seem to care about the future. He tells himself that World War I was simply a precursor to Armageddon, and he acknowledges that violence and turbulence are still happening around the world and that those events are part of the beginning of Armageddon too. However, he is still unsatisfied with this idea and feels frustrated and angry with his parishioners’ indifference.
Mrs. Bodiham comes in quietly, wearing a black dress and carrying a large envelope addressed to Mr. Bodiham. He opens it and finds a pamphlet for an ecclesiastical clothing store in Birmingham; it includes illustrations of young, handsome curates modeling the clothes, which disgusts Mr. Bodiham. He throws the pamphlet away. Mrs. Bodiham says quietly that the village is getting “worse and worse every day” (45).
Denis listens to Henry play the piano. He wants to dance, but instead pretends to read. Gombauld and Anne dance together gracefully, and Mr. Scogan and Mary dance together somewhat awkwardly. Jenny sits in the corner, writing in a red notebook, and Priscilla and Mr. Barbecue-Smith discuss spiritual matters. Mr. Barbecue-Smith says that optimism is an expansion of the soul toward God and pessimism is a contraction of the soul toward darkness.
Denis feels resentful as he watches Gombauld and Anne dance. He wishes he had “a face of brass” like Gombauld (47). Mary approaches Denis, startling him, and asks him what he is reading. Distracted by Anne and Gombauld, Denis had not even been aware of the title: it is a historical account of horse racing in the 18th century. Mary tells him he is smart to sit and read quietly and adds that dancing is boring. He ignores her, trying to listen to Priscilla and Mr. Barbecue-Smith, but then Mary asks him which contemporary poets he likes. Exasperated, he remembers the three diseases of wheat and says, “Blight, Mildew, and Smut” (48).
Later that night, Denis lies in bed, unable to sleep. He feels miserable about Anne, himself, the future, and the entire universe. He gets out of bed and writes a nine-line poem that describes the pain of unknown and unfulfilled desires. He throws the poem away, gets in bed, and falls asleep immediately.
Mr. Barbecue-Smith leaves the next morning, and the rest of the group watches his car drive away from the courtyard. Henry concludes that Mr. Barbecue-Smith was a good addition to their company for the weekend. The group walks down the hill from the terrace to the pool, and Denis remarks that the person who built Crome must have been an architect. Henry tells him that the builder was Sir Ferdinando Lapith, who lived during the reign of Queen Elizabeth. Sir Ferdinando had inherited the estate from his father, who had acquired it during the dissolution of the monasteries. At the time, all that sat on the property was a cloister of monks and a pond they used for fishing. Sir Ferdinando used the stone from the monks’ buildings to construct Crome. The group stares at the house, which looms over them menacingly.
Mr. Scogan says that the best thing about Crome is that it is unmistakably a work of art that could never be mistaken for a naturally occurring phenomenon. He argues that only the poor should live in homes that look like they have grown out of the earth; wealthy, sophisticated people should not imitate peasants and should instead live in obviously artificial, constructed dwellings.
Henry interrupts him to continue talking about Sir Ferdinando, who, during the construction of Crome, was concerned only with the proper placement of the privies. He even published a pamphlet on the subject in 1573. Sir Ferdinando believed the privies should be as far from the sewage containment system as possible, which meant that they should be located at the top of the house and connected by vertical shafts to an underground sewage system. Locating the privies close to the sky meant they would be closer to God, which would “counteract [the] degrading effects” of urination and defecation (51). Another way to accomplish this would be to put inspirational religious literature in each privy. Henry bemoans the 18th-century modernizations that required this system to be rebuilt but is glad the pamphlet exists so that Sir Ferdinando’s ideas are not forgotten. He stands in momentary silence, meditating on permanence, transience, and the mysterious workings of the universe.
Mr. Scogan enjoys hearing about eccentric English aristocrats and argues that they bring glory to their respective ages. Eccentricity, he claims, is the birthright of the aristocracy; every society must have a class that can do whatever its members want, especially because eccentric aristocrats often encourage eccentricity in others. In an extended metaphor, he compares the aristocrats to “Red Indians” and the rest of society to “Poor Whites,” claiming that someday the flamboyant “Red Indians” will be incorporated into the huge group of “Poor Whites” and people like Denis and Henry will not be allowed to do things like write poetry and live at Crome (53). Anne cuts him off, asking whether people like him will be allowed to talk. He says no and tells her he will have honest work to do.
Mary reflects on Denis’s reference to “Blight, Mildew, and Smut,” reluctantly concluding he was deliberately making fun of her. She angrily assumes he said this because he does not take women seriously. She decides to flirt with Gombauld instead, as he is a more serious worker, and she plans to associate herself with her future husband’s work.
Gombauld uses an unused granary in a field beyond the farmyard as his studio. The granary stands above the ground and is accessible by a short ladder, and Gombauld paints there for six or seven hours a day. He had been a Cubist painter for the past eight years, after which he went through a phase of “formalized nature” painting and a phase in which he painted only pure, abstract geometrical forms (55). While he enjoyed his abstract phase, he became upset by how few—and how uninteresting—the forms were that he could come up with. He decided his paintings would combine rich, nuanced images from nature with simple, formal ideas. He put together a portfolio full of ideas, one of which, his current project, is a painting of a man falling from a horse. The horse is immense and takes up most of the canvas, while the man’s smaller body lies in the extreme foreground; a white light illuminates the figures from the right foreground, and the background is intense, empty darkness.
Mary knocks at the granary door while Gombauld is taking a cigarette break, contemplating the painting. She climbs the ladder and hands Gombauld a letter that arrived for him. However, her candid face reveals that this is simply a pretext to talk to him. She looks at the painting, surprised not to see a Cubist masterpiece and confused about how to react to this odd image. She finally remarks on the large amount of chiaroscuro and Gombauld agrees. Emboldened, she says that while the painting is fine, she finds it too trompe-l’oeil for her taste. She describes a painter she encountered in Paris, Tschuplitski, whose work has become increasingly abstract: She suspects that he will eventually just present a blank canvas and that once he reaches total abstraction, he will simply become an architect. Gombauld says that he is going to continue painting and then puts his arm around Mary, guiding her to the ladder. He gives her some light smacks on her lower back and tells her to be careful on her way down. She leaves the granary, walking pensively through the farmyard.
This section opens with an important scene in which Mary and Anne discuss sexual repression. Their conversation suggests that the novel is aware of and interested in contemporary psychological theories about sexuality. Mary’s references to her dreams evoke the work of Sigmund Freud, whose The Interpretation of Dreams was published in 1899 and translated into English in 1913. This scene further develops both Anne and Mary as characters: it emphasizes Mary’s interest in intellectual pursuits and her practical, almost scientific approach to love and sex and underscores the fact that Anne has not received a formal education but is eager to learn new things. Moreover, the coded language they use to discuss desire and sex leaves the subject open to multiple interpretations. It is impossible to determine with complete confidence whether they are talking about straight or queer sexual acts, which makes it impossible to know for sure whether Mary and Anne are straight or queer. This complicates the novel’s representation of every relationship, particularly since so much of the narrative focuses on romantic feelings and courtships.
This part of the novel also features Christianity in a significant way, starting with Mr. Scogan’s absurd suggestion that Anglican clerics wear their clothes backwards and leading into Mr. Bodiham’s sermon. A footnote at the end of Chapter 9 informs the reader that Mr. Bodiham’s sermon was actually given by a man named E. H. Horne in 1916 and then published as pamphlet titled The Significance of Air War. The association between religion and violence throughout the sermon—and Bodiham’s enthusiastic hope that yet more violence will ultimately take place in the name of God—seems to be central to the novel’s satirical approach to organized religion and points to its theme of The Gulf Between Ideas and Reality. Additionally, Bodiham justifies the fact that his predictions about the apocalypse were incorrect the same way that Priscilla justifies the fact that astrology does not help her accurately predict sports matches. In other words, the novel portrays all religion as ultimately rooted in a mistaken sense of authority over reality.
Finally, these chapters continue to develop the theme of Changing Gender Roles and Sexual Politics by focusing on the breakdown of normative heterosexual courtship rituals. Denis is still unable to tell Anne that he loves her and can only direct his feelings into poetry, which he immediately throws away. In line with the voyeurism that characterizes much of the novel, Denis watches Anne and Gombauld develop a flirtation, feeling increasingly insecure and inadequate. Mary’s attempts to flirt with Denis and Gombauld are both wildly unsuccessful despite the fact that she used logical reasoning—as evidenced in her conversation with Anne—to determine why each would potentially be a good mate for her. Moreover, knowing that Denis is a poet and Gombauld is a painter, Mary tries to develop her own identity as an intellectual by asking both men questions about their work. This also proves ineffective, and both men react with frustration; ultimately, Mary’s failed efforts to subvert traditional conventions of romance narratives—in this case, putting herself on the same intellectual par as the men around her—suggest that the novel sees these conventions as nearly impossible to overcome.
By Aldous Huxley