63 pages • 2 hours read
Hampton SidesA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Fremont, Carson, and their group sought revenge for the May 9 attack at Klamath Lake. Splitting into two groups, one led by Carson and one by Fremont, they circumnavigated the lake, attacking any Indians—regardless of tribe—they met along the way. Everyone, including Carson, was in agreement that the attackers needed to be severely punished. “‘Very sick before,’ one of their Delaware allies said, after killing and scalping two Klamath. ‘Better now’” (131).
Carson’s group soon stumbled on the fishing village of Klamath Dokdokwas, another local tribe, when many of the men were out hunting or fishing. Carson and his men quickly killed 21 Indians and burned down the village. Carson claimed they spared the woman and children, but one member of his band recalled seeing a dead old woman, and the Klamath themselves maintained that many women and children were slaughtered. It was “by any standards, pure and literal overkill,” and, in Carson’s words, “a beautiful sight” (131-2). Sides references another historian, David Roberts, who writes in his book A Newer World that scholars now agree that the Dokdokwas were likely the wrong target. The Indians who attacked Fremont’s expedition were likely Modocs, bitter enemies of the Klamaths; thus, Caron and Fremont attacked innocent people.
Their assault on the Klamath Dokdokwas caused them significant trouble. As word of the massacre spread, nearby tribes began to attack them whenever possible. Gillespie was unused to this sort of hardship. “By heaven,” he exclaimed. “This is rough work!” (133-4).
Colonel Diego Archuleta’s assessment of the sorry state of the Army of the West was not far from the truth. Traveling at a blistering pace of 20 miles a day, on one-third rations and dying of heat, Kearny’s Army of the West was suffering by mid-August. They had lost two-thirds of their horses, which Sides highlights that Kearny, “the equine sentimentalist,” must have found “hard to bear” (135). Kearny also imposed increasingly stricter punishments on his men to keep order.
Although his young cohort was eager to fight the New Mexicans, Kearny showed a restraint borne of experience. “He preferred not to view the New Mexicans as enemies at all” (137), as he understood that the goal was not to crush an enemy, but to integrate New Mexico into the United States. At every settlement he encountered, he gave a similar speech to that he gave at Las Vegas: The United States will protect you, will not harm you, and will keep your women safe. He released captured spies sent by Armijo, partly to show mercy, partly because he knew they would impart the enormous size of his army to the enemy.
On August 17, Kearny’s men camped at the ruins of the ancient Pueblo city of Pecos. Here, the Pueblo had for hundreds of years secretly tended to a fire which they prophesied would finally be extinguished when they were freed from their Spanish conquerors. Though the Pueblo had been expelled from the ruins in 1838, the Americans liked the symbolism of the legend. They saw themselves as liberators, not understanding that while they weren’t pillaging precious metals, as the Spanish had, they were just as selfishly determined to find “their own kind of gold” (138-9): a route to California.
The American invasion of California began with the “revolt” of a group of self-styled American revolutionaries who called themselves Osos, or “bears.” Described as drunken American “hotheads,” on June 14, the Osos took over the small village of Sonoma, declaring their “Bear Flag Republic” an independent nation-state.
When the Mexican General Jose Monterey responded by demanding the Osos leave the country, Fremont had his excuse for war. He abandoned any pretense of being an explorer and shifted into military mode. When two Bear Flag men were killed by Mexican guerrillas, Fremont reacted with disproportionate violence, sanctioning the cold-blooded execution, by Carson, of three innocent prisoners. The incident remains, Sides argues, one of the most cruel and baffling episodes of Carson’s life, representing “a kind of dark symbiosis between authority and action” (143-5). Whatever Fremont ordered, Carson would comply, often to murderous effect.
Two weeks later, Fremont’s new Californian Battalion arrived at the provincial capital of Monterey, which Robert Field Stockton and his Pacific Squadron had taken without a fight. A well-traveled and ambitious man, Stockton became Fremont’s close ally. Shooting off a hasty and untruthful declaration of war to General Jose Castro, Stockton sent Fremont’s men to San Diego to conquer Southern California. There, the presence of an English flagship, the Collingwood, seemed to confirm American fears that a British invasion was imminent; in fact, the Collingwood was simply there to gather intelligence.
On July 25, Fremont’s men sailed for San Diego. The mountain men, especially Carson, took poorly to sailing. Fremont took San Diego without a fight on July 29; Stockton arrived soon after. They combined their forces and took Los Angeles on August 13, again without a contest, and Governor Pico fled to Baja California. On August 17, Stockton prematurely “declared California to be United States soil and named himself both commander in chief and governor” (149). He planned to push further into Mexican territory, making Fremont the governor in his stead; both men were unaware that a resistance movement was brewing.
On September 5, Stockton and Fremont, “anxious to get the glorious news of the conquest to Washington—and to place their version of events in the hands of President Polk himself” (149-50), sent Carson to deliver their dispatches to the president in person.
With Kearny and his Army of the West only a day away from Santa Fe, Manuel Armijo was frantic. He gathered the legislators and then the officers of the militia, asking them whether he should fight or treat with the enemy. When all responded that they must fight, Armijo seemed exasperated. He claimed that he had no faith in the strength and organization of the volunteers and, to everyone’s shock, disbanded the entire defense force at Apache Canyon. “As he did so, he affected a look of intense exasperation, as if they were the ones who had let him down” (151-2). Armijo wrote a letter to Kearny claiming that he was not surrendering but merely making a temporary retreat, and he raided the coffers of the Palace of the Governors before fleeing. Even Diego Archuleta was somehow convinced (likely through a bribe from Magoffin) not to stay, “a tack quite uncharacteristic of him” (153).
Kearny heard the news but didn’t believe it until he arrived at Apache Canyon. Had it been properly defended, it would have posed a huge problem for his army—“a second Thermopylae,” one historian suggested, recalling the famous battle in which the Spartan king Leonidas and his 300 defended a narrow coastal pass against Persian invasion. With Armijo gone, Santa Fe was left undefended. It became the first foreign capitol captured by the United States. One man, George Gibson, described Santa Fe as “without taste,” offering “nothing to pay us for our long march” (155-6). Santa Fe had always been “the end of the line […] a geographical and cultural terminus” separating civilization from wilderness (156-7).
Kearny announced that the United States had taken possession of New Mexico, to which the governor quickly acceded. The New Mexicans mourned; “‘Their pent-up emotions could be suppressed no longer,’ one lieutenant said, ‘and a wail of grief arose from the depths of the gloomy buildings on every hand’” (157-8).
By fall of 1846, Narbona’s concern about the encroaching Americans—and the fort he’d heard they were building at Santa Fe—was increasing. Culturally, the Navajo had no drive to conquer distant lands and extend their territory as the Americans were doing.
Narbona did not understand what they wanted with this part of the world […] he scarcely had a concept of white men at all and could not fathom that there existed on this earth a people who looked and behaved and spoke and worshiped their gods and organized themselves so differently (158-9).
The Navajo “were a resourceful people, making use of nearly everything they found within their reach” (161-3). Navajo women had an unusual amount of independence and power; they could own property, and Navajo culture was both matrilineal and matrilocal. Tall tales about white men abounded in Navajo circles. They had strange physical attributes, the rumors said: long ears, no anuses, strange growths on their forehead. Southwestern tribes had long believed that a conquering race would emerge from the east, and the rumors of these white invaders seemed to suggest that threat: “Our country,” frets one young man in Navajo Texts, “is about to be taken away from us by men such as these” (159-60).
The Navajo lacked a clear leader, instead ruling by assembly, but if any leader were to be chosen, it would be Narbona. He had an exceeding amount of wealth, commanded respect, and was famed for his generosity. Narbona took a group of warriors to check out the fort at Santa Fe.
Chapters 16 through 20 introduce a darker side of Kit Carson. His brutality, stemmed from two sources: first, from Carson’s own quick temper and desire for revenge; and second, from his sometimes slavish willingness to follow orders, even when they went against his conscience.
Carson’s slaughter of the Klamath village was not only excessively violent but also unnecessary: Modern historians believe the Modocs, not the Klamaths, to be the likely proprietors of the attack against Fremont. Such “blind vindictiveness,” however, was not unusual in the frontier, especially by the law of the Indians. In Chapter 39, a group of Cheyenne will apply this same retributive code to Carson for abuse suffered by a group of U.S. Army soldiers.
By the law of the frontier, culpability was put on a person’s entire tribe or ethnicity, not on the individual him or herself, perhaps because locating the exact perpetrator would be nearly impossible in such a vast wilderness. The Americans will, in fact, enact a similar punishment in the 1860s when they force all the Navajo to relocate for the raiding of a few. As brutal and inexcusable as Carson’s actions were, they make sense in the context of his world. Less easy to account for is Carson’s subservience to Fremont, especially in the killing of unarmed men. In Sonoma, Fremont’s exhortation to do his “duty” was, apparently, good enough for Carson. Without a second thought, Carson turned and gunned down three innocent men in cold blood.
Carson’s behavior is especially heinous in contrast with that of Kearny, who seems resolute in his decision to treat the New Mexicans (and Indians) with as much respect as could be afforded. While Carson was a trailblazer, hacking a path into the wilderness, Kearny believed he had to win over the people he was conquering so that their cultures could be assimilated. Carson’s type, while useful in the initial foray into the West, would soon be replaced by men like Kearny, who would be vital in patching together a working peace. Both sides, however, were equally at fault in their determination to pilfer “their own kind of gold” from the West (139). The Anglo-Americans were conquerors, and conquest could succeed only through the defeat of their enemies.
By Hampton Sides