58 pages • 1 hour read
Karen ArmstrongA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Karen Armstrong reflects on her personal journey with religion and God. As a child, she held various strong religious beliefs, such as the presence of Christ in the Eucharist and the reality of Hell, yet these beliefs did not bring her any comfort or confidence in life. She recollects a Roman Catholic definition of God she learned as a child, which she found abstract and distant. Her efforts to seek God more intimately led her to join a religious order, where she delved deeply into religious teachings.
However, she found herself struggling to truly connect with God, often feeling inadequate. Her doubts about various church doctrines grew, and she eventually left the religious life, with her belief in God fading. Despite her personal detachment from faith, her interest in religion persisted. Through her studies, she learned that many religious doctrines evolved over time and were man-made. She initially believed God was a mere projection of human needs, but her extensive studies revealed more nuanced perspectives from various religious thinkers, suggesting that one’s relationship with God is deeply personal and sometimes non-traditional. Some even propose that God is a product of human imagination, yet belief remains a significant part of many people’s day-to-day reality. She now recognizes humanity’s intrinsic connection to spirituality and posits that secularism is a new human experiment.
The human perception of God has evolved and differed among various groups and across different times. These perceptions can differ so much that one generation’s concept of God might be meaningless to another. Declaring belief or disbelief in God is inherently contextual, tied to the prevailing understanding of God at a given time. Thus, there is no singular, unchanging definition encapsulated within the term “God.” Instead, it carries numerous meanings, some of which can be conflicting.
The adaptability of the idea of God is what has allowed it to endure. It’s evident that conceptions of God vary, and when they lose relevance, they get replaced. Historically, every generation creates a God-image that suits its needs. Atheism too has its nuances, with denials aimed at specific conceptions of God prevalent at particular times. Religious pragmatism dictates that the utility of a God-concept is more crucial than its logical or scientific validity. The transcendental experiences humans have cannot be aptly expressed in normal language.
Monotheistic religions have tried to capture this transcendence as “God” but assert that it surpasses human description. Unlike scientific theories, religious ideas about God do not follow a linear progression. Throughout history, similar ideas about God appear across monotheistic religions. Despite modern secularism, conceptions of God remain influential, with Armstrong stating that “ninety-nine percent of Americans say that they believe in God” (21).
The history of God is characterized by passion and intensity, with monotheistic experiences often being extreme. Monotheistic religions initially rejected pagan myths, but these crept back in over time, introducing elements like God’s femininity. The male-centric monotheistic language around God sometimes creates linguistic challenges. All monotheistic religions believe that God communicates, emphasizing the importance of His Word. The relevance and meaning of the term “God” for contemporary society remain questions for reflection.
The evolution of human perceptions of God is examined. Initially, humans embraced the notion of a singular, supreme deity, so elevated that it seemed beyond human representation or a specific form of worship. Father Wilhelm Schmidt introduced the concept that this singular deity, often referred to as the “Sky God” and prevalent especially among Indigenous African tribes, faced decline over time. This deity’s diminishing presence and its eventual vanishing act mirror modern claims that the God of monotheistic religions like Judaism, Christianity, and Islam has “died.”
Historically, earthly life was seen as a mere reflection of divine archetypes. Ancient cities and temples were considered earthly counterparts to divine entities. Sacred rituals, such as the Babylonian New Year Festival, bridged the human and divine worlds by reenacting mythological narratives, highlighting the fragile balance between order and chaos.
The Enuma Elish, an ancient Babylonian creation myth, declared that deities emerged from a watery abyss, signaling that there was no creation out of nothing in these ancient tales. Central to this myth is the tale of Marduk, one of the Babylonian gods, battling Tiamat, the embodiment of chaos. Marduk’s eventual victory and the subsequent creation of the sky and human realm from Tiamat’s body encapsulates the Babylonian belief that creation is a laborious process, while also underscoring the interconnectedness of gods and humans, suggesting a shared essence.
The influence of the myth of Marduk and Tiamat on the Canaanites is apparent, particularly in tales about their god, Baal-Habad. Like Marduk, Baal’s stories involve triumphs over chaotic forces, emphasizing the divine nature of creativity. The focus then shifts to early Hebrew history. The Israelites, primarily united by their devotion to Yahweh, the God introduced by Moses, are explored in depth. The Bible’s initial five books, or the Pentateuch, were consolidated by the 5th century BCE and contain accounts from diverse sources, shedding light on variations and contradictions in biblical narratives. Notably, two primary authors from the 8th century BCE, “J” and “E,” differentiated their God with the names “Yahweh” and “Elohim,” respectively. Their accounts suggest the evolving religious vision of the Israelites. The Bible hints at different points in time when Yahweh became known, pointing to shifting perceptions. The intertwining of Israelite and Canaanite traditions and beliefs is evident, such as when places were renamed, like Luz becoming Beth-El.
Jacob’s encounters with God at locations like Beth-El and Jabbok provide insight into the transformation of the Canaanite High God toward a more universal role. In ancient times, gods were judged by their efficacy, and Israelites’ relationship with their deity was rooted in pragmatism. The biblical stories, especially those like the Exodus, shape perceptions of God, from a powerful force executing vengeance to a compassionate deity. The history also touches upon the possibility that Yahweh might have originated separately from the Canaanite High God, El.
The relationship between Israelites and Yahweh undergoes numerous shifts. Moses’s encounter with the burning bush in Midian introduces a more distant and awe-inspiring Yahweh. Events like the giving of the Ten Commandments at Mount Sinai further this narrative of distance between the divine and humanity. Historical records indicate that despite their commitment to Yahweh, Israelites often revered other gods, leading to tensions between older pagan beliefs and the emerging worship of Yahweh. The Temple in Jerusalem, dedicated to Yahweh, stands as a testament to this intermingling of beliefs. The prophet Elijah’s public challenge to the prophets of Baal in the 9th century BCE serves as a pivotal event, emphasizing the aggressive stance of early Yahwism.
An exploration of the Axial Age (800-200 BCE) reveals global shifts in ideologies. Unique beliefs like Taoism, Confucianism, Hinduism, Buddhism, and monotheism emerge. The concept of “God” evolves alongside market economies. The Indian religious experience, shifting from Vedic gods to internal realizations, emphasizes the inner meaning of rites and introduces the idea of the Brahman, the sustaining power of everything, and the Atman, the divine within. Hinduism’s view of God is as an encompassing reality, beyond mere human comprehension, embodied in the concept of Brahman—an experience surpassing logic. Armstrong details Siddhartha Gautama’s journey to becoming the Buddha. After attaining enlightenment, he was urged by deities to share his wisdom on suffering’s truths and its cessation, emphasizing ethics and compassion. While not denying gods, Buddha valued achieving the spiritual state of nirvana—liberation from suffering and rebirth.
Greek philosophers Plato and Pythagoras believed in a permanent, divine reality beyond human sensory experiences. Plato proposed eternal forms like Love, Justice, and the pinnacle, the Good, that hint at a supreme reality. These forms, reached through introspection, later influenced mystic practices in monotheistic religions. Plato viewed human thought as recalling inherent knowledge, since humans were seen as fallen divinities. Aristotle, more empirical, posited that forms existed in tangible objects but recognized religion’s power in conveying deep human truths. He introduced God as the Unmoved Mover, eternally self-reflective and initiating universal motion. Although humans, with their divine intellect, were considered close to God, Aristotle’s deity seemed uninvolved with worldly matters. Both philosophers, representative of the Axial Age, emphasized human morality and justice, but their concepts often felt distant to common folk.
The Introduction and first chapter chart the emergence of religious thought, emphasizing Religion as a Universal Human Experience. Armstrong’s personal journey mirrors the broader trajectory of how humanity’s understanding of the divine has changed over time. She grapples with dogmatic beliefs in her youth, moves toward skepticism, and finally arrives at a more nuanced understanding after extensive study. Every generation, Armstrong suggests, crafts its own image of God, tailored to its needs and circumstances.
Chapter 1 delves into the ancient origins of this evolutionary journey. The concept of a singular, overarching deity, the “Sky God,” holds sway initially, particularly within Indigenous tribes. With time, this singular entity fades, a phenomenon likened to modern claims that the God of monotheistic religions is “dead.” Such claims further emphasize the fluid nature of religious beliefs, evolving in response to societal changes and historical events. The narratives from Babylonian and Canaanite traditions also support this, showcasing the human attempt to bridge the gap between the known and the unknown, between order and chaos.
The intersection of various religious beliefs becomes particularly evident in the Israelites’ history. The worship of Yahweh, introduced by Moses, often grapples with the remnants of older, pagan traditions, indicating the interplay between existing beliefs and emerging ones. Such intersections highlight how religions, rather than being isolated silos of belief, often draw from and influence each other. This dynamic becomes even more pronounced during the Axial Age, a period of significant religious and philosophical innovation, where diverse beliefs, from Taoism and Buddhism to the philosophies of Plato and Aristotle, emerge. These new ideologies, while differing in their specifics, often grapple with similar existential questions and share common threads.
The interplay between various religious beliefs raises the question of whether religious similarities arise predominantly from direct influence and cultural exchange, or if they can naturally emerge in isolated societies. This tension between shared influence and independent emergence is a complex and debated topic in religious studies. On the one hand, many religious scholars posit that similarities in religious beliefs and practices arise due to direct or indirect interaction between societies. The trade routes, migrations, and conquests of ancient times facilitated the exchange of ideas, leading to the syncretism or blending of religious practices. For instance, the spread of Buddhism from India to China led to its melding with Taoist and Confucian beliefs, resulting in unique Chinese Buddhist traditions.
On the other hand, the phenomenon of religious parallels in geographically and culturally distant societies, with no documented historical contact, suggests that certain spiritual and existential themes might be universal to the human experience, echoing the theme of Religion as a Universal Human Experience. The existence of flood myths in diverse cultures, from the Mesopotamian Gilgamesh epic to Native American legends, might hint at shared archetypal stories that arise from a collective unconscious, as theorized by psychologist Carl Jung. Additionally, religions across the globe grapple with questions of life and death, morality, and the nature of the divine, suggesting that irrespective of cultural or geographical differences, humans share certain fundamental concerns and curiosities.
Furthermore, cognitive science of religion (CSR) provides another perspective. Some researchers in this field argue that certain religious ideas are more “cognitively optimal” than others, meaning they naturally resonate with universal human cognitive processes. Thus, similar beliefs or myths might arise independently in disparate cultures because they align with these inherent, biological cognitive structures.
While certain themes may be universal, their expression is molded by cultural, historical, and environmental factors. The interplay of shared human experience and unique cultural contexts results in a diversity of religious beliefs and practices, with both shared motifs and distinct traditions. The challenge for scholars is to discern when similarities are the result of direct influence, when they arise from shared human tendencies, and when they might be a blend of both. Drawing from broad societal shifts, like the rise of market economies, or pivotal events such as the Exodus, Armstrong underscores how religious narratives are both a reflection of, and an influence on, societal needs and perceptions. While Armstrong sometimes acknowledges the shared themes that resonate across cultures, her approach tends to suggest that religions are deeply shaped by their specific historical and cultural contexts, as explored in the theme of The Influence of Social Change on Religious Belief. Through Armstrong’s lens, it becomes evident that while certain spiritual evolutions might be intrinsic to humanity, their expressions are deeply intertwined with the times and societies in which they emerge.